Wiki User
∙ 14y agoDarren!
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoLarge intestine
His experiment supplied evidence that DNA is not the genetic material by showing that the activity of the material responsible for transformation was not affected by protein-destroying enzymes, but was destroyed when a DNA-destroying enzyme was present. Cristian Mendoza 11/1/12
smoke
the names of references
yes
NO
Heating the lethal pneumonia bacteria in Griffith's experiment likely killed them because the high temperature denatured the proteins and disrupted the structure of the bacterial cells, leading to their death. This process would have rendered the bacteria unable to replicate or cause infection in experimental animals.
plan the experiment
The most likely hypothesis for the experiment was that increasing the temperature would speed up the reaction.
This experiment demonstrates the concept of transformation, where genetic material from one organism is taken up by another resulting in a change in phenotype. The injected bacteria likely acquired the pathogenic genes from the dead bacteria, causing them to become virulent and resulting in the death of the mice. This highlights the importance of understanding genetic transfer mechanisms and the potential dangers of gene transfer between organisms.
The cast of Most Likely - 2011 includes: Melina Chadbourne as Alice Darren
experiment
Roger Bacon did not invent the magnifying glass. Although he wrote about the principles behind magnification through lenses in the 13th century, the magnifying glass as we know it today was more likely developed in the early 1200s by Arabian scholars.
Fair
Probably not. It's likely to be a scam.
Bacteria.
No, bacteria generally thrive at moderate temperatures that fall within their optimal growth range. A temperature of 100 degrees Celsius would likely be too high and could lead to cell damage or death, inhibiting bacterial growth. Population sizes would not increase faster at this extreme temperature compared to 15 degrees Celsius.