Can some genetic mutation in human fetus with tail during embryonic stage which disappear before birth a proof for Evolution?

Answer 1

It is possible you are thinking of the biogenetic law proposed by Ernst Haeckel. His idea as an evolutionist was that the human embryo, as it develops goes through various stages which resemble its alleged evolutionary past, such as a fish stage with gills etc.

Unfortunately Haeckel did not let the facts get in the way of a good story. This idea has been demonstrated to be utterly fraudulent. The drawings of embryos which Haeckel produced were changed to support his theory although in actual fact human embryos never have gill slits for example. Every creature is destined to be exactly what it was designed to be.

So, in short, this is no proof of evolution but a recognized fraud. It must also be stated this is not merely a creationist position but was recently exposed further by evolutionists themselves. It is also not correct to refer to these alleged changes as mutations. They were regarded as stages of embryonic development. == "There are several human atavisms that reflect our common genetic heritage with other mammals. One of the most striking is the existence of the rare "true human tail" (also variously known as "coccygeal process", "coccygeal projection", "caudal appendage", and "vestigial tail"). More than 100 cases of human tails have been reported in the medical literature. Less than one third of the well-documented cases are what are medically known as "pseudo-tails"" see link 29+ Evidences for MacroevolutionHuman embryos have a tail that measures about one-sixth of the size of the embryo itself. As the embryo develops into a fetus, the tail is absorbed by the growing body. see link Wikipeida TailHaeckel's hypothesis may not have been 'fraudulent', but it has certainly been proven wrong. The foetus tail is interesting but it is not evidence of evolution. Fortunately evolution does not need this proof.