Machine-dependent (generally called "platform-dependent")
High-level languages are easy to read and write. They are not machine dependent and portable from one computer to another. Assembly languages are machine dependent, easier to read than machine code but it's still not easy to read, and the assembler program translates the assembler program straight into machine code.
Yes. Both first and second generation languages are machine-dependent. The first generation of languages were machine code, while the second were assembly languages. Non-machine dependency came about with the advent of the third-generation of languages, all the high-level languages.
When the code is targeted towards a specific machine architecture. Machine code is entirely machine-dependent, as is the low-level assembly language used to produce that machine code. High-level languages are not machine dependant, however source code can still be targeted towards a specific architecture or platform. Such code is non-portable, however many high-level languages provide methods to filter machine-dependant or platform-dependant code such that the same source code can be compiled on different machines and platforms.
FORTRAN (FORmula TRANslator) is the best-known earliest example of machine independent language. This is where the language is not dependent on the characteristics of the computer. COBAL (COmmon Business-Orientated Language) is the other type of programming language that is machine independent. COBAL was developed by the US Navy for business applications.
Machine-dependent (generally called "platform-dependent")
High-level languages are easy to read and write. They are not machine dependent and portable from one computer to another. Assembly languages are machine dependent, easier to read than machine code but it's still not easy to read, and the assembler program translates the assembler program straight into machine code.
Yes. Both first and second generation languages are machine-dependent. The first generation of languages were machine code, while the second were assembly languages. Non-machine dependency came about with the advent of the third-generation of languages, all the high-level languages.
The difference between high level languages and machine languages are as follows: 1)Machine language uses binary numbers/codes but high level languages(HLL) use key words similar to English and are easier to write. 2)Machine Language is a Low level language and is machine dependant while HLLs are not.
When the code is targeted towards a specific machine architecture. Machine code is entirely machine-dependent, as is the low-level assembly language used to produce that machine code. High-level languages are not machine dependant, however source code can still be targeted towards a specific architecture or platform. Such code is non-portable, however many high-level languages provide methods to filter machine-dependant or platform-dependant code such that the same source code can be compiled on different machines and platforms.
FORTRAN (FORmula TRANslator) is the best-known earliest example of machine independent language. This is where the language is not dependent on the characteristics of the computer. COBAL (COmmon Business-Orientated Language) is the other type of programming language that is machine independent. COBAL was developed by the US Navy for business applications.
*Low-level languages -- "natural language" of a computer & such as , is defined by its hardware design.. it is also a machine dependent, can be used on only one type of a computer. *assembly languages -- a set of instruction that a programmer can used to create program for use on a specific proccessor. *High-level languages -- that provide s some level of abstractions from assembler language & independence from a particular type of machine.
Both must be translated into a common language. That language is machine code, the native language of the machine.
High-level programming languages are closer to natural human languages as opposed to machine languages which are in any order of sequences for binary values. High-level languages almost always have to be compiled or interpreted into machine code. For interpreted languages, the process is the same but it involves a intermediary code called bytecode that is optimized compiled code that is specific to the interpreter that makes it faster to run the same code into machine code faster than if the interpreter has to do from high-level code from the beginning.
Machine Language is the lowest level language other than microcode as it is what the processor itself uses to handle operations. Assembly is low level as it is very close to machine language. Higher level languages have higher levels of abstraction and more structure to them, such as C++. Lower level languages are very operation based.
Low-level languages, primarily assembly languages, are those with very little abstraction between the source code and the resultant machine code. They are generally machine-dependent languages; that is, they are non-portable between machine types. Each machine type has its own variant of assembly language and requires its own assembler. High-level languages have a high degree of abstraction between the source code and the resultant machine code. As such, they are generally machine-independent; the same source can be compiled or interpreted upon any machine with a suitable compiler or interpreter. C, C++ and Java are typical examples of high level languages.
Machine language is something which can be understood by machine(Computer), it can understand only 0 and 1 i.e. the binary code. High level language is something which can be understood by human beings.. for ex... english.