Wiki User
∙ 11y agothe whole food chain would die out due to loss of their main food source, unless they just happen to have another choice of food to eat.
Let's bury them all and start a new virus-free web at once,
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoWiki User
∙ 13y agothe other consumer in the food web will have more advantages upon the producers and have more food
If a producer was removed from a food web, it would disrupt the entire ecosystem. Producers are the foundation of the food web, as they convert energy from the sun into food for other organisms. Without producers, herbivores would lack a food source, leading to a decrease in their population, which would in turn affect the populations of predators higher up in the food chain.
A mouse is a primary consumer.
As herbivores, they would be primary consumers.
no, a fish is a primary consumer
A snail is a primary consumer because it primarily feeds on producers such as plants and algae. As a herbivore, its diet consists mainly of plant material, making it a primary consumer in the food chain.
Why would you ask if it's a decomposer. It's a fish. I think it's a primary consumer.
A primary consumer.
yes because it would not be a primary consumer.
Cod is a secondary consumer, as it feeds on smaller organisms such as plankton and smaller fish. They are part of the food chain where they consume primary consumers in order to obtain energy.
Primary consumer would be a cow that ate grass, secondary consumer would be the lion that ate the cow that ate the grass. Primary consumer is the fish that eats algae, secondary consumer is the barracuda that eats the fish that ate the algae. It expands to tertiary consumers as well, which would be the shark that ate the barracuda that ate the fish that ate the algae.
i think it would be producer, then primary consumer, then secondary consumer, then tertiary consumer.
I think it is a primary consumer I am not certainly sure