Turning it around, whatever you believe, religion is a vital force in our society worldwide with many more people professing to have some belief in one or many gods than profess to being atheistic so why would you want to deliberately exclude it from children's education? In fact if you do exclude it are you not de facto imposing a minority agenda (Atheism or at least agnosticism) on them through ignorance? If people are to have true religious freedom (as I believe they should) then they need to know something about the various beliefs just as freedom of political belief requires you to have knowledge of politics.
>> Why don't public schools teach religion?
>> public schools
>> public
Not everyone in the public has the same religion, or a religion at all. There are literally thousands of religions; which to chose? And what of those who choose to reject religion?
Other religions (or religion in general) may be right or wrong, but because there is no legal way to make such a determination, we choose not to include it in schools.
Public schools should not teach religion. Religious instruction is not a necessary tool in a child's intellectual development. In fact, religious dogma may retard intellectual growth. Think of the many different belief systems that exist in the world today. Many are so fundamentalist that they teach children to disbelieve science and to view it as being on the same level as religious 'belief'. They restrict intellectual growth. The modern world could not function on that level. It is much better to allow a child to learn about the world and then make their own decisions about religion.
Religion should be a private matter and should be taught in the home.
i think they should, but others disapprove because they may have a different religion, so i think that they should teach about religion in school.
religion is a central part of many schools, both in the US and across the world. In the US, there are catholic schools and thousands of other faith-based schools. These schools are considered private schools, in the sense that they do not receive public funds. You must pay to attend these schools. they teach normal classes, but in addition, they also teach religion. Public funded schools are strictly forbiden from teaching religion, due to separation of state and church. If the public schools were to teach any religion, that could indicate a government preference for one religion over another, which is undesirable. Government and religion are treated separate, in order to acheive freedom of religion. State sponsored religion should be avoided, because it causes problems, such as civil war and oppression of other religions.
Well, christianity, hinduism, sikism, and jewism in my school.Answer:Most publicly funded schools do not teach religion. The exceptions are private religion based schools that teach their own faith.
yes, there should be camera's in schools, it will teach the students how do do photography.
Yes
They educate on a lot of religions, they don't teach one single religion as it is not a religious country.
yes , they should !
NO
No, Montessori schools do not provide religious teachings. They believe that a child can choose what they want to believe in.
It depends on the religion, most, not all, teach intolerance to other religions, most have a moral guideline about what should and should not be done. But.. I don't see many christian women sacrificing turtles.
Yes I Think Students Should Be Able To Share Their Religion In Public Schools , Because Some Students Have Different Religions .
The government cannot sponsor or promote specific religious practices in schools, coerce students to participate in religious activities, or show preference for one religion over others. Additionally, public schools cannot teach religious doctrine as objective truth or require students to pray in a particular manner.