Generally this is how the concept of Induction and Deduction will move
* Induction - particular to general. * Deduction - general to particular. However this is actually untrue. Either arguments starting with or ending with a Partcular or generalisation. An argument that is Deductively invalid can be Inductively valid.
Eg; Inductivley valid, but Deductively invalid.
(Particular) My apple is red
Your apple is red
(General) All apples are red
(General) If something is red, it is a Tomato.
Your car is red
(Particular) Your car is also a Tomato Obviously untrue statements, however to constitute as Inductively valid one must only display a logical correlation of concepts.
Eg; Deductively valid.
(General) If you don't have a ticket you can't ride the bus.
You don't have a ticket.
(Particular)so, you can't ride the bus.
...maybe read the Wikipedia page too! Its hard to define but easy to understand.
Induction is reasoning down to a set of principles, from facts. Deduction is going from a generalized down to particulars.
lkvmxk
Induction in the opposite direction
Deduction STARTS with a generaliztaion! Induction ENDS with a generalization!
Neither. It is an IDENTITY.
In research, deduction involves reasoning from general principles to specific conclusions, while induction involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Both deduction and induction are important in developing hypotheses, testing theories, and advancing scientific knowledge through logic and evidence.
Exemption doesn't form part of total income while deduction form part of a total income.
it is the difference between the synchronous and asynchronous speed of a induction motor
The Declaration of Independence uses DEDUCTIVE thinking
The Banker's Gain (BG) is the difference between a banker's discount and a true discount. It is a deduction with simple interest.
* deduction * induction * speculation
Reduction means making the object smaller, reducing the size of something. Deduction means taking something away, making the amount smaller.