"Game Changers" can refer to a variety of things, such as a book title or a concept in sports or business. It is not a bibliography itself, but it could be included in a bibliography as a source or reference depending on the context. It's important to specify which "Game Changers" you are referring to for a more precise answer.
Yes, as the year and publisher.
All the books that you have consulted for the paper.
The information that must be included in a bibliography or a works-cited list are the author's name, title of the article, publication date, and other publication details.
The information that must be included in a bibliography or a works-cited list are the author's name, title of the article, publication date, and other publication details.
You should have a bibliography when your article draws on things you have learned from other publications.
A bibliography is a page where you cite things
The name of the place where the book was published
on a bibliography you write sites that u visited while u were searching for information
Personal opinions, irrelevant details, or excessive background information about the author or the topic are typically not included on a bibliography card. Stick to essential details like author, title, publication date, and source.
The specific chapter consulted
When you do a review of literature, you read a lot of things... and you can put all of those things on a page to show what sort of background you had when you wrote something. When you do a Bibliography though, you only use those publications that you are actually citing in your work. If you make no reference to it, then it shouldn't be in the bibliography.