'Ordinal approach is rational than cardinal approach' This statement is not a properly formed phrase, please ask questions that make sense.
Cardinal: people can enumerate their utility differences from different baskets of goods or services. I.e.) they can put a number to how much they like something. Ordinal: people can provide rankings of different baskets of goods or services. I.e.) they can say which combinations of goods they like better than others, but not by how much. Additionally, we basically assume transitivity, continuity, rationality, and convexity of preferences.
Cardinal utility is seen in instances where satisfaction can be measured in numbers like 1, 2, 3 and for example, someone may prefer 2 hamburgers to 1. In ordinal utility, it is impossible to quantify the utility according to numbers, but here, preference and rank come to play. Someone would rate a bicycle lower than a motorcycle.
When discussing cardinal vs. ordinal, it is helpful to look at what the words mean. The distinguishing factor here is between cardinal and ordinal numbers. Cardinal numbers are 1, 2, 3; ordinal numbers, 1st, 2nd, 3rd. Some crucial differences follow from that. Whereas mathematical operations can be performed on cardinal numbers, they cannot be performed on ordinal numbers. Now, when talking about cardinal utility, it is an attempt to ''measure the utility of various alternatives. When talking about ordinal utility, it is the ''ranking of alternatives.'''' Cardinal utility is, however, an erroneous concept. It is impossible to "measure" utility. People can only say "I prefer A to B", but cannot meaningfully say "I prefer A 2.5 times more than B" or something to that effect. Furthermore, comparisons of utility between different individuals are impossible and meaningless, as well as between the same individual at different points in time (as individuals can and do change their preferences -- that is, ordinal value-scale rankings). Because value is subjective, we cannot measure it and cannot compare between two different people, or even between the same person at different times. To clarify, ordinal utility culminates in value-scales: 1st: A2nd: B3rd: C whereas cardinal utility is the erroneous attempt at measurement: 10utils -- A7utils -- B3utils -- COmar Tawfik.
is economic imbalance is better than nuclear imbalance
'Ordinal approach is rational than cardinal approach' This statement is not a properly formed phrase, please ask questions that make sense.
He thought it was better than death.
what is a learning organization? Is this approach to strategic management better than the more traditional top-down approach in which strategic planning is primarily done by top management?
The first step is to decide on your approach, which could be that it is better to be late than never, that it is not better to be late than never, the pros and cons of being late, but still doing what you set out to do, or some other approach. Next, you need to gather information that supports the approach you chose. Make an outline of what you are going to write. Write the essay and give it a title. Proofread and finalize your essay.
Ordinal. Tests responses are usually correct or incorrect. This would be assigned a value and the number of correct answers is the score of the test. There is a logical order, a correct answer is better than an incorrect answer, so it is not nominal data. Even though we calculate averages, test responses are not interval data, as there is no meaning to the interval. See related link.
This is a subjective question with no real answer.
Why have liberal strategies failed to create a normal recovery of jobs? It was supposed to do better than the conservative approach, but has failed. Why?
First, Second, Third ... are called Ordinal Numbers.
It is actually a ratio scale, which is more demanding than an interval scale.
Cardinal: people can enumerate their utility differences from different baskets of goods or services. I.e.) they can put a number to how much they like something. Ordinal: people can provide rankings of different baskets of goods or services. I.e.) they can say which combinations of goods they like better than others, but not by how much. Additionally, we basically assume transitivity, continuity, rationality, and convexity of preferences.
The design and the holistic approach of user interface, hardware and software. But if you are really fond of windows, then you might not like apples approach of hiding the technology behind a sweet looking interface.
He wrote all musical genres of his day better than the rest, and excelled at every one.