0
Augustus at the turn of the milennium foresaw the problem, and set about stabilising the borders on the defensible Rhine-Danube line, and in the Middle East and North Africa he worked on diplomacy.
Instability in the empire started with internal struggles for leadership. Then the successive migration westwards of Goths, Vandals, Huns, etc created problems of defence, then absorption, which delayed but did not overcome the eventual collapse of the western part of the empire, which ceased to have an emperor after 476 CE. The Empire lived on in the east centered on Constantinople, shrinking until captured by the Turks in 1453 CE.
While the internal turmoil between contestants for the emperorship was a destabilising factor, the basic fact is that the borders were simply too long and open to be defended against the hordes from the east which kept pouring in.
The decline of the Roman Roman Empire started in what has been called the Crisis of the Third Century, during which:
a) There were constant invasions across the frontiers of the empire which massively overstretched the army
b) There was a string of military rebellions and usurpations with as many as 35 usurper emperors. Two parts of the empire broke away for a short time.
c) There was runaway inflation.
Hyperinflation was caused by many years of debasement of the Roman coins. The silver and gold content of silver and gold coins had been continually decreased by many emperors to make more coins to finance their expenses and to increase the size and the pay of the army. This devalued the coins. The coins eventually came to have virtually no value. They had as little as only 5 % of precious metal. This led to runaway inflation. The usurper emperors made this worse by issuing their own coins, which further increased the supply of money. The effects of out of control inflation were:
1) A breakdown in trade. It became difficult to exchange goods with a worthless currency.
2) The urban economy collapsed. Manufacturing in cities shrunk because their goods, which were for long-distance trade, could not be traded.
3) Agricultural production on the large landed estates became localised. Sales of crops for the cities decreased and these estates concentrated on production for local barter.
4) Many people migrated from the cities to the countryside and the population of the cities shrunk.
5) The owners of the large estates employed the migrants from the cities as servile labour. These people lost their rights and became tied to their landlords.
6) Distressed peasants who were leaseholders on the large estates were leaving their land in search for better opportunities. They were often turned into servile labour in the large estates as well.
6) The tax revenue of the state decreased, while expenditure increased as the size of the army increased. The mentioned invasions also led to greater reliance on a much expanded cavalry, which was expensive.
7) Taxation was increased and was raised in the form of demanding goods, which did not help the economy. Emperor Diocletian resorted to confiscating goods. These were ended by Constantine, but taxation remained a burden on the people for the rest of the history of the empire.
Constantine the Great managed to bring inflation under control by creating a new and stable sold coin (the solidus). However, this benefitted only those who could afford gold coins. The masses had to make do with copper token money (the follis) which had been created because the previous coins had collapsed. The follis was very vulnerable to inflation. The overall result of the crisis was a decline of the economy of the empire which became fragmented and localised. Trade did not regain its previous levels; the economy remained less based on money and the gap between the rich and the poor who had to rely of the vulnerable follis widened. The changes in the economic structure created by the crisis were irreversible.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why is capitalism called an efficient economic system?
Cause of its comparison to the other economic systems.
Everythong held constant a decline in interest rates will cause spending on housing to?
FAll
What was the economic cause for World War 1?
Economic Causes of World War OneOne Ecinomical cause of WWI is land, everyone WANTED LAND!
What was the cause of Northern economic growth?
Industry
What is the main cause behind economic slowdown2008?
What_causes_global_economic_crisis
What problems contributed to the decline of the Roman rebublic?
The political instability, economic and social problems, and weakening frontiers cause the decline of the Roman Empire.
What is considered a major cause of the fall of roman empire?
economic issues
What are specific examples of politics in history?
The Roman Empire One the many theories as to why the Roman Empire fell blames unthoughtful leaders, economic inflation, and invasions by hostile forces. *Geography in this case was the CAUSE of the Roman Empire.
Why the deline in population was so harmful to the roman empire?
The decline in population was harmful to the Roman Empire because it led to a decrease in available labor, which impacted the agricultural and economic productivity of the empire. The loss of population also weakened the military strength of the empire, making it vulnerable to external threats. Additionally, with fewer people to pay taxes, the empire struggled to fund its administration and defense.
What is the cause of rise in independent regional powers after the decline of the mugal empire?
The cause of rise in independent regional powers after the decline of the Mughal Empire was the emergence of Successor States to the Mughals.
How might have slavery been a cause for the decline of the Western Roman Empire?
Slavery was in the past considered a contributor to the decline of the western part of the Roman Empire because slaves were war captives, and the supply of slaves dwindled with the end of imperial expansion. This was assumed to have affected production. This view has now been challenged. Slave labour was not used everywhere in the Roman Empire, neither the western nor the eastern part. It was a big feature especially in Italy but was not widespread in many places outside Italy. It was virtually absent in Africa and much of the eastern part of the empire. Moreover, even during the heyday of slave labour, there was the use of wage labour for the more seasonal type of agriculture, especially olive and grape picking. In the Later Empire there was the growth of servile peasant labour on the large landed estates in many areas of the empire. Therefore, even in the eras with large use of slave labour, there was this type of labour supply. Archaeological finds challenged he concept of economic decline of the Roman Empire. In the east, in Egypt, Palestine and Syria there was actually economic growth. In the west, Africa was prosperous. In the south of Italy there was economic growth. In Africa and Egypt there seem to have been an increase in the use of wage labour. Southern Gaul did not seem to have been in economic decline. Economic decline seems to have occurred in northern Italy, northern Gaul and Britannia. These regional variations were not linked to the presence or absence of slaves or the extent of slave labour and a proportion of the total labour force.
What is considered as a major cause of fall of the roman empire?
The invasions by the Germanic peoples precipitated the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. They eventually took over all of its lands. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years.
What is the Cause of rural decline in Mexico?
Few economic opportunities and increasing industrialization
What do some scholars think was a cause for the decline of the empire of Great Zimbabwe?
overpopulation
What cause the roman empire collapse?
barberians
How did this development help cause the decline of the western roan empire?
State which development if you want an answer.
What social problems helped cause the roman empires decline?
Famine and disease spread throughout the empire
