The way that England could have made things fair is not to charge raw materials just to live on North American land because England doesn't truly own North America in any way shape and or form.
As long as the fair lasted.
That the workers get paid a fair amount of money unlike things like transnational cooperations (TNC's) who get paid next to nothing, when you work for fair trade and if you have left over money, you could improve things like schools and communities.
Fair trade aims to guarantee the growers and pickers of produce a fair price for the work they've done. Prior to the scheme's introduction, 3rd world farmers could be paid literally peanuts for vast amounts of produce.
Hh
It is fair weirdo
It was fair to the British because the have to pay for the French and Indian war. But taxing the colonies was not a fair way of getting that money, because the colonists had no one in England lobbying for their interests.
yes it is fair to keep a chipmunk in England but be careful= - ]
because, England voted for the taxes, not America, AKA the 13 colonies. Second of all the taxes went to England, for a war America wasn't in.
the colonies did not think it was fair
My Fair Lady is set in London, England.
it let them get away from the England ruler because they didn't get treated fair by not getting to have their own religion. so it improved their life by letting them believe what they want to believe.also to influence their religion on others. : )
Yes she was a very fair leader for England.
To pay for the costs of fighting the French and Indian War/Seven Years Wars, and keeping the Eastern part of colonies from being attacked by the French. The British felt it was the duties of the Colonies to help pay for the war that was for their benefit as well as the benefit of England. Why shouldn't the Colonials pay their fair share for a war that was for their protection and allowed the British to control the Eastern part of North America?
Cabury (in England)
It depends on from which side you look at it from. The Colonists felt that it was unfair because up until that time period they hadn't been taxed by England, due to salutary neglect. However, the Colonists did cause the French-Indian War. This war costed England a lot of money. The only way to pay for the war was to tax the nation's subjects. England had every right to tax the Colonies. Furthermore, citizens living in England itself were paying higher taxes for a war the Colonies started. So the Stamp Act was reasonable and fair, but the Colonists did not feel that way. Any tax is "fair" if it passed by representatives elected by the people who will be taxed. The colonists were justified in claiming the tax was unfair since they were subjected to "taxation without representation." DIFFERENT SIDE OF THE DEBATE: Ant tax is "fair" if the tax is enacted by representatives elected by the people who will be taxed. The colonists were justified in claiming the tax was not fair since they were subjected to "taxation without representation".
It would have been fair because as you state they were the "colonies", i.e., still British territory, before gaining independence as the USA.
New England, state