answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

One environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels is air pollution, which can lead to respiratory diseases and contribute to climate change through the release of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3mo ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which of following is an environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Earth Science

Is not an environmental consequence of using fossil fuels?

A worldwide infrastructure extracts, processes, and transports fossil fuels. (Apex)


Of the following is an environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels?

One environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels is air pollution, which leads to poor air quality and negatively impacts human health and the environment. Additionally, the burning of fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change and global warming. The extraction of fossil fuels can also result in habitat destruction and disruption of ecosystems.


What is not an environmental consequence of using fossil fuels?

A worldwide infrastructure extracts, processes, and transports fossil fuels. (Apex)


Is an environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels?

One critical environmental consequence of using fossil fuels is the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, leading to climate change and global warming. This can result in various environmental impacts such as rising sea levels, more extreme weather events, and disruption of ecosystems. Transitioning to cleaner energy sources is essential to mitigate these consequences.


What is an environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels?

One environmental consequence of using fossil fuels is air pollution, which contributes to smog, acid rain, and respiratory problems. Another consequence is the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, which leads to global warming and climate change. Lastly, the extraction and production of fossil fuels can also harm ecosystems through habitat destruction and contamination of water sources.

Related questions

What is an environmental consequence of using fossil fuels?

A worldwide infrastructure extracts, processes, and transports fossil fuels. (Apex)


Is not an environmental consequence of using fossil fuels?

A worldwide infrastructure extracts, processes, and transports fossil fuels. (Apex)


Of the following is an environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels?

One environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels is air pollution, which leads to poor air quality and negatively impacts human health and the environment. Additionally, the burning of fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change and global warming. The extraction of fossil fuels can also result in habitat destruction and disruption of ecosystems.


What is not an environmental consequence of using fossil fuels?

A worldwide infrastructure extracts, processes, and transports fossil fuels. (Apex)


Is an environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels?

One critical environmental consequence of using fossil fuels is the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, leading to climate change and global warming. This can result in various environmental impacts such as rising sea levels, more extreme weather events, and disruption of ecosystems. Transitioning to cleaner energy sources is essential to mitigate these consequences.


What is an environmental consequence of the use of fossil fuels?

One environmental consequence of using fossil fuels is air pollution, which contributes to smog, acid rain, and respiratory problems. Another consequence is the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, which leads to global warming and climate change. Lastly, the extraction and production of fossil fuels can also harm ecosystems through habitat destruction and contamination of water sources.


Environmental consequence of using fossil fuels?

One major consequence of using fossil fuels is the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, which contributes to global warming and climate change. Fossil fuel extraction and burning also leads to air and water pollution, harming ecosystems and human health. Moreover, the extraction process can destroy natural habitats and landscapes.


What environmental effects do fossil fuels have when burned?

They release oxygen.


The heating up of earth due to burning of fossil fuels is known as?

Environmental pollution is one of the things that comes from the use of fossil fuels.


How do fossil fuels impact the earth?

Burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change and global warming. Extraction of fossil fuels can also disrupt ecosystems and habitats, leading to environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity. Additionally, the use of fossil fuels contributes to air and water pollution, impacting human and environmental health.


What are some environmental consequences of using fossil fuels?

Burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) releases greenhouse gas carbon dioxide that has been hidden away for 300 million years. Adding it now to the atmosphere is causing global warming and climate change. This is a huge consequence to the environment.


What is the opposite of fossil fuels called?

Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power are considered the opposite of fossil fuels. These sources are considered sustainable and have lower environmental impacts compared to fossil fuels.