If a source doesn't cite research or other specific sources they may not be credible and are expressing opinion rather than facts. Also if the item seems strange, outrageous, or just not true most likely it isn't credible. Look at who reported or wrote the item and find out their experience and expertise in the area they are writing or reporting. Look for more than one source for the same information.
There are several indicators that can determine how credible a source is, however, the one that sticks out the most is based upon factual information. When reviewing a source check to see if the information within is fact based. If you cannot find another source to back the information as fact, chances are this is not a reliable source to use.
A source being a personal website is likely not credible because it may lack peer review or editorial oversight. Bias may also indicate lack of credibility. Sources published in reputable magazines and those with named authors are generally more reliable.
literacy-reseach-studies.edu (apex)
its accuracy can be corroborated
Not true
It is reliable
"Credible" is defined as "Being believable, based on information, source or fact." - Something that is credible, is reliable, it's trustworthy.
study information from texts on ancient China and N. America to discern which source is credible
The credibility of a certain a certain blog depends on its content. You can identify it.
Scholastic is generally considered a credible source, especially in the context of educational materials for children and young adults. However, as with any source, it is always recommended to verify information independently from multiple sources.
If a source is biased, it provides information which is slanted one way or another. It isn't a credible source because it isn't presenting the facts in a straight-forward manner.
Yes,fairly reliable.