0
The same things we do now a days.
Not exactly. In the 17th century, the term "witch" was specifically applied to those who used magic to cause harm. Those who used magic in the way modern witches do were usually referred to as "wise-folk" or "cunning-folk". The term "witch" was rehabilitated in the mid 20th century, and now has a very different meaning to the 17th century usage.
Many old women were accused of being a witch, and many died an innocent death. For an example, If a lady were caught being a witch, or if she were accused of being a witch, they would tie rope around her stomach and put them in the water. If they floated on water, this obviously meant they were a witch because people believed witches were made of wood. If they sunk they weren't a witch, but they were dead anyway. This was a very unfair way to find out if somebody was a witch or not.
================================
The European Witch craze reallykicked off in the late 15th century with the publication of the Malleus Maleficarum by Kramer and Sprenger. Various bits of folk belief & medicine had been tolerated until then but as the Middle Ages saw faith being replaced by reason and the power of the Church undermined not least by new knowledge from the Islamic World (seen by the Church as devil worshippers anyway) the Church became increasingly oppressive. The belief in what witches did was probably largely defined by the beliefs of the persecutors rather than the victrims themselves.
In England the persecution was not by the Church but by the State. Of roughly 800 witches executed 80% were women & 20% men. Over 300 of these were hanged by Matthew Hopkins.& his henchman John Sterns in Essex.
In England torture had been officially abolished in 1640 and the confessions are often of incredibly trivial matters such as disputes over the price of herrings, whereas where torture was routine succh as Scotland & France victims confess to turning into cats, flying broomsticks, eating dead bodies from graves etc.
Witches did not really do any of this, but this reflects what the authorities thought they did. Many "wise women" or "cunning folk" were not accused but accused others of withcraft.
"Swimming witches" was done in the belief that holy water would reject a witch. If you sank you were not left to drown but pulled out. Even so many contemporaries did not believe in witchcraft - notably Jan Weyer who first coined the term "mental illness" to describe the victims confessions and Reginald Scot from Kent.
Most "modern" witchcraft is based upon the writings of Gerald Gardner or Alexander Saunders or Aleister Crowley. Gardner in particular claims to have resurrected 17th century paganism along the lines of the theories of Maragaret Murray. These have been extensively debunked by subsequent historians such as Professor Ronald Hutton (a man who says he was brought up as a pagan).
Currently people who imagine themselves to be witches are self-deluded if they believe their own brand of amateur dramatics represents any kind of historical continuity at all & if they do not make it up as thjey go along then they follow sonmeone else who does.
witches in the 17th century were the worst of all. People believed that they casted spells had magic cauldrons and much more. Some could turn themselves into animals and turn others into animals. Witches use to fly on broomsticks and do all sorts of evil things.
This is what the people believed
Many times they were innocent women who had other women jealous or suspicious about them and were declared witches to get rid of them.
Often it was a way to get coveted land away from your neighbor since a disgraced family would be forced to move away and the land sold. So, mostly they were hard working folks who were legally murdered in the name of religion.
Actual witches were Herbalists, Naturalists and Pagan folk who held to their beliefs against overwhelming religious biases of the time. They risked their very lives continuing to practice what they believed and refused to bow to the pressures of other religious doctrines.
Also, People with Birthmarks in certain places would have been persecuted.
i, for instance, have a small hoof/trotter shaped birthmark above my heart area of my chest, this would have been seen as a 'stamp' or mark of the devil and i would be likely to have been put to death after birth.
It wouldn't be done by your parents most likely, but it would have been general consensus from your local villagers, et cetera, that you were a Witch (or Warlock) and a Son of the devil
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How were witches caught?
witches were caught int he 16th and 17th century by being tested in different ways
How old were witches in the 17th century?
Any age. Even small children could be identified as witches.
How did Cromwell make them look like witches in the 17th century?
who look ?
What were the 17th century people of England scared of?
witches and the spanish armada
How were witches punished in the 17th century?
they were hanged , burned and swimming test
How common were witches in the 17th century?
There were multiple people said to be witches. They were never proven true or false. There were told to be about 10 witches in a town per year.
In the 16th and 17th century how many witches were found in which locations in essex?
0ver 300
What would happen to witches that got caught casting spells?
During medieval times, they would be imprisoned or killed. As late as the 17th century, witches were stoned or burned.
What did British people believe about witches in the 17th century eg. evil and superstitous?
British people in the 17th century sometimes held the superstitious beliefs that someone could become possessed by the devil. They did not believe that these people were responsible for their actions. Those who made a pact with the devil however were considered to be evil and witches.
What did witches from the 17th century hate the most?
Witches were blamed for stuff like: if peoples crops failed to grow they would blame it on witches they were blamed if there was storms at sea. They were blamed if there was freak weather conditions. And if and illnesses or sudden deaths happened.
What century is 1608 in?
The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.The 17th century.
How were witches treated in 17th century?
in the 17th century Witches where treated very poorly , they where normally accused of being a old lady in the woods with either a black cat.they would be hanged , burnt alive or they would be 'dunked' this is where they would tie them up and place them into a lake or river , if they floated they where classed a witch , but if they didn't they wouldn't be a witch , but either way , they would a die . 'Duh' .what where named 'witches' where treated Very badly and didn't deserve to be treated that way.Hope that covers a bit about witches !!
