It depends on why they are vegetarian. If they really cant eat meat then I wouldn't know why but if they chose to be vegetarian then they most likely don't like eating dead animals.
A second viewpoint:
Vegetarians comprise a broad variety of personality types, many of whom do not complain at all, but rather just want to live their own lives without judgment. There are many reasons people may become vegetarians--health, religion, treatment of animals, eco-efficiency, or others. There may be a correlation between personality type and the political aspect of a particular vegetarian's reasoning.
They don't?
It might be more interesting if one knew why this question was asked.
Some chefs could "hate" vegetarians because that could challenge their experiences and capabilities. Similarly, a host that is unfamiliar with a vegetarian or vegan diet might find it difficult to develop a separate menu for such a guest, especially if their dietary needs are not indicated in advance.
Also, some vegetarians or vegans will have no qualms about challenging the dietary habits or even the clothing choices of non-vegetarians. It could be that politics enters into this more so than the actual diet.
Heeey, I am a Vegetarianand we talk about being vegetarians because we are proud, it is a great thing
Not being a cannibal I've never eaten a vegetarian.
Some are and some are not. There is no rule saying you have to be vegetarian.
Vegetarians eat less saturated fat than meat eaters so they often escape heart disease which kills most Americans who die of disease. Vegetarians have a lower rate of cancer. Vegetarians are less likely to be obese. To be objective, a vegetarian diet is not necessarily healthier than being a non-vegetarian but it often is!
Someone claims to be vegetarian, but isn't. Often used by vegetarians to describe semi-vegetarians, and pescetarians.
Are non-vegetarians strictly non-vegetarian? That's kind of a philosophical question. The straightest answer, based on what they eat, would probably be no. Most non-vegetarians are not pure carnivores, they're omnivores, meaning: they eat just about everything, some of it [the non-vegetarian stuff] made from animals, and [the vegetarian stuff] not made from them. But if you want to talk about vegetarianism in terms of thought and not simply appetite then, of course, all non-vegetarians are non-vegetarian. They have no compunction about using animals for their intake whatsoever. They do not identify as vegetarians, they do not act as vegetarians, they are not vegetarians. So you have two choices: thought or strict deed. I would say that yes, they are non-vegetarian. But in our world of shifting identities and shifting identity politics I guess I will leave your choice about how you would call this weird little call up to you.
Being vegetarian is not synonymous with thinness. Vegetarians who eat a lot of junk foods and sodas can still gain an unhealthy amount of weight.
This is the food pyramid for vegetarians
Check the ingredients. There is vegetarian gravy, but most conventional gravies are made with meat drippings. You can make vegetarian gravy, or buy a mix for it.
It is really difficult to answer such questions as being or not being vegetarian is completely a dynamic and individual choice and hence no record of such a thing is found anywhere.
It is really difficult to answer such questions as being or not being vegetarian is completely a dynamic and individual choice and hence no record of such a thing is found anywhere.
It is really difficult to answer such questions as being or not being vegetarian is completely a dynamic and individual choice and hence no record of such a thing is found anywhere.
It is really difficult to answer such questions as being or not being vegetarian is completely a dynamic and individual choice and hence no record of such a thing is found anywhere.