0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the name of the type poem written in tribute to a dead person absent or an inanimate object?
apostrophe
Is molecule living or dead?
A molecule is not a living thing. It is not a dead thing either, since to be dead it must first have been living. A molecule is an inanimate object or item.
Is pencil a living thing?
No, it is an inanimate object. It does not breath, it cannot move on its own, it does not respond to stimuli.
What are the differences between dead objects and inanimate objects?
Dead objects were once alive and possess biological characteristics, whereas inanimate objects were never alive and do not have biological characteristics. Dead objects can decay or decompose over time, while inanimate objects do not undergo these processes.
Is the word body an inanimate object?
The noun 'body' may be a word for an animate or an inanimate thing, depending on context; for example:the body of a human = animatethe body of an animal = animatethe body of a legislature or a committee = animatethe body of a letter = inanimatethe body of a report = inanimatea dead body = inanimate
What word means not endowed with life?
dead or inanimate
Is a dead person considered inanimate?
I wouldn't say so.
What is the difference between a relatives and an ancestor?
ancestors are dead
Is a rock living nonliving or dead?
A rock is nonliving because it does not exhibit any characteristics of life, such as growth, reproduction, metabolism, or response to stimuli. It is considered an inanimate object composed of minerals.
What is the difference between sea of galilee and the dead sea?
difference is the dead sea is very salty caused mainly by the Jordan river
Is there a literary device called Hyphens?
Yes, in fact there is: A hyphen is when in a novel a character addresses someone or thing that can not respond, ever. Often a dead person as they can not respond , but also can be an inanimate object like a tree or wall.
Is there any difference between an inanimate object and a dead object?
In some ways this is a trick question as many dead objects, such as road kill, are themselves full of bacteria and viruses and larvae, so the are far from dead. In this circumstance we use the term dead to indicate the loss of a certain level of consciousness through the death of a multicellular creatures coordination system. Living and dead is a concept, not a scientifically or logically provable state. The concept is that living objects are composed of nonliving matter and an organised living component. Dead objects are either past living objects or never have been alive, either way they are somehow missing the living component. The simplest component is a nonliving, or never have lived, item such as a hydrogen atom. This is a theoretical object, as we can not presently measure or even observe the difference between this item in a living and nonliving state. At present it has been measured that living complex microscopic structures utilize energy in a manner that can not be explained using the quantum or billiard ball style of physics modeling. The observed and measured energy production process within the mitochondria of all living cells is explicable only if we consider energy transfer as a wave or field. It is therefore proposed that we presently place the division between living and nonliving objects as "living objects utilize energy as a field to power their coordinated chemical and electrical activities". Nonliving objects or components can be brought into this field or taken out. If this was the model adopted one can quickly see that we are starting to consider the 'object' as a nonliving component under the control of a field. This is also unlikely as modern physics considers atoms to be part of (entangled with) this field. So we go full circle and perhaps have to conclude there is no such separation. That all things are, and always will be alive, but that the field is just more obviously, visually and energetically active in objects or structure we consider living.
