This type of question has no clear "yes" or "no" answer. I suspect most people will tell you that it depends on the situation. For example, if a person has made a request not to have their life prolonged by articificial means and that person's family respects those wishes, if a doctor or a panel of medical experts has agreed that the end of life is near and there is no chance of a recovery, once that patient stops drinking liquids, they will usually die within a few days, and usually this is relatively peaceful.
But if a patient is conscious and requesting liquids, they should not be withheld unless for some reason the intake of liquids would further endanger the patient. One example I can think of is if the patient has a fistula (a hole which has developed but should not be there, as in the case of a cancerous growth) between the trachea (breathing tube) and the esophagus (swallowing tube), if the patient swallows liquid it could go into the lungs, thereby in effect drowning the patient. In this case, of course liquids should be withheld.
As you can see, there are many different situations requiring individualized decisions on the part of patient, medical staff and family which have to be taken into consideration.
A physician does not have the right to withhold a patient's medical records if he has an outstanding balance. This is a law in most states in the United States.
The word that means morally right is "virtuous."
A patient develops anuria and begins having headaches, dyspnea, and vomiting. What canbe done to keep this patient from going into a coma or dying?A. Administration of antibiotics C. Urgent surgeryB. Administration of anti-inflammatories D.HemodialysisD it the right answer
Righteousness is a noun. It refers to morally right behavior or the quality of being morally right or just.
yes, there is. Some would argue that the taking of life (killing someone) is morally wrong. A counter-argument might be if in self-defence, the taking of a life might be morally right, since it preserves another's life. However, this does not contradict the point that the taking of a life is still morally wrong. Indeed, the taking of a life can be both morally right and morally wrong.
The term morally wrong refers to an act of human behavior that is not accepted as right by society.
Yes, it is.
Study of what is morally right and wrong.
It is not morally right for anybody to impose their religious beliefs on anybody else, and this is especially wrong if they are in a position of power.
yes, it is called executive privilege
executive privilege
National Security