It was similar because they were both taken out of their homes then put in a camp.
They both had poor living conditions like little food, water and you had cramped living conditions, The cherokee and Japanese had to build their own houses. They were different only in a few ways like for one reason their different is different people were put in camps and the japanese were treated a little better and were provided transportation the japanese weren't asked to change their ways of living like the indians were.
It was similar because they were both taken out of their homes then put in a camp. They both had poor living conditions like little food, water and you had cramped living conditions, The cherokee and Japanese had to build their own houses. They were different only in a few ways like for one reason their different is different people were put in camps and the japanese were treated a little better and were provided transportation the japanese weren't asked to change their ways of living like the indians were.
they continued to lose land promised to them
sequoyah
no not at all
A guy named Jackson wants to remove the Cherokee because they have better land. He said that the land out west is better, but it's really not. The Cherokee do not believe him because he has broken every single promise he has made to them. That's the Cherokee Removal act.
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 US 1 (1831)Cherokee Chief John Ross fought the removal of native Americans through the US Supreme Court, and petitions to congress.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
He felt the he was forced in his action and that the removal of the Cherokee's was wrong.
Those purported Cherokee that signed the treaties involved with the Indian Removal act violated "The Law of the Snake" and they, as well as their families, were executed for it.
Andrew Jackson
The Cherokee
Need removal and installation instructions for an ignition lock cylinder -- 1999 Grand Cherokee Limited?
Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia