Nothing should happen; that is reason you have fully redundant links, in case a link fails.
The whole network will be down and none of the hosts will have network connectivity.
Any connection failure in a bus topology will result in the network becoming unusable due to signal bounce in the affected cable.
The network connection breaks because the one path being used is broken.
yes
The disadvantages of a tree network are that it requires alot of cable to network and that if the central hub fails then the entire network fails. Also, it is not a prudent expense for a small network.
the rest of the network is unaffected but if a channel fails then the whole network fails.
It's because your operating system was configured to update network folders even if there is no any. Every time when your connection fails OS starts to update folder catalog as result you have lagging.
Try it
Yes it can and the reason is because of redundancy provides for a backup route or network connection in case of a link failure. The core hardware is typically interconnected to all distribution network hardware and the objective is to ensure that the data traffic continues for the whole network even if a core networking device or link fails.
A star network is often the best choice for a library due to its centralized structure and ease of management. This setup allows for efficient communication between all devices and ensures that if one connection fails, it does not impact the entire network. Additionally, it is easier to troubleshoot and expand as needed.
ping is a test command. It sends a "ping" to a specified IP which should ACK back, when the ACK is received the message turnaround time is calculated. If the IP fails to respond it times out and reports failure. You can use this command to verify network connectivity, etc.
If one fails the others may need its help so they also fail.if heart fails to work, we will die!