0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was probably true about contracts between landowners and Sharecroppers?
The land owners took advantage of the sharecroppers leaving them poor and in need.
What was possibly true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Sharecropping contracts typically favored the landowners, often resulting in unfair terms for the sharecroppers. Landowners controlled the land, tools, and supplies, ultimately keeping a significant portion of the crops produced by sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were often left with very little profit or autonomy.
Who were sharecroppers and how did they differ from landowners?
Sharecroppers were agricultural workers who rented land from landowners in exchange for a share of the crops they produced. The main difference between sharecroppers and landowners is that sharecroppers did not own the land they cultivated, while landowners were the ones who owned the land and typically provided resources such as tools, seeds, and housing in exchange for a portion of the harvest.
What was probably true about contracts between landowners and share croppers?
Landowners typically held more power in the contract negotiations, resulting in terms that were more favorable to them. Sharecroppers often faced unfair treatment, volatile economic conditions, and limited mobility due to debt obligations. Landowners' control over resources and land often kept sharecroppers in a cycle of poverty and dependency.
What is the true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Contracts between landowners and sharecroppers typically outline the terms of the arrangement, including the division of labor, the sharing of crops, and any compensation for the sharecropper. These contracts can vary widely and are subject to negotiation, but it's important for both parties to clearly understand and agree to the terms to avoid disputes later on. Landowners often provide land and resources, while sharecroppers provide labor and expertise in cultivation.
What would most likely be listed in a contract between landowners and sharecroppers?
The portion of the crop the landowner owed to the sharecropper
Why was there tension between surfs and landowners?
because the serfs were slaves and had no freedom and were part of the landowners property
What was probably true about contracts between landowner and sharecropper?
It is 'probably true' that all these contracts heavily favored the landowner. He kept the books and could manipulate costs and profits at will. And of course: no profit, no profit share and payment for the sharecropper. Also, it is true that many landowners had a 'company store' that the sharecroppers were obliged to use. So, even if there was a profit share, most or all of it went to the payment of the debt run up at that store.
What was a similarity between convict and sharecroppers who were in debt?
They had no choice about continuing to work
What was a similarity between convict labores and sharecroppers who were in debt?
They had no choice about continuing to work
What was a similarity between convict labors and sharecroppers who were in debt?
They had no choice about continuing to work
What was a similarity between convicts laborers and sharecroppers who were in debt?
They had no choice about continuing to work.
