a semaphore is a stoplight and or traffic signal.
Semaphores and monitors are both synchronization mechanisms used in concurrent programming, but they have some key differences. Semaphores are simple integer variables that are used to control access to shared resources by multiple threads. They can be used to signal when a resource is available or to block threads until a resource becomes available. Semaphores are low-level and require explicit management by the programmer. Monitors, on the other hand, are higher-level constructs that encapsulate both data and synchronization operations within a single object. Monitors provide a more structured way to manage shared resources by allowing only one thread to access the resource at a time. Monitors also provide mechanisms for condition variables, which allow threads to wait for specific conditions to be met before proceeding. In summary, semaphores are lower-level synchronization primitives that require explicit management, while monitors are higher-level constructs that provide a more structured and convenient way to manage shared resources in concurrent programming.
strong semaphores specify the order in which processes are removed from the queue, which guarantees avoiding starvation. Weak semaphores do not specify the order in which processes are removed from the queue.
Search Google with: "Linux semaphores" and have a look through the websites on the subject.
As the use of semaphores in the past has caused more problems than created solutions therefore semaphores are not use in the producer and consumer problem.
The signal() operations associated with monitors is not persistent in the following sense: if a signal is performed and if there are no waiting threads, then the signal is simply ignored and the system does not remember the fact that the signal took place. If a subsequent wait operation is performed, then the corresponding thread simply blocks. In semaphores, on the other hand, every signal results in a corresponding increment of the semaphore value even if there are no waiting threads. A future wait operation would immediately succeed because of the earlier increment.
Like condoms.
send signals
To avoid deadlocks using semaphores, you need to carefully plan the order in which semaphores are acquired and released in your code. Make sure to always acquire semaphores in the same order to prevent circular dependencies. Additionally, consider using techniques like timeout mechanisms or resource hierarchy to prevent deadlocks.
The use of semaphores
Semaphores provide synchronization between threads to prevent race conditions and ensure orderly access to shared resources. They are more efficient than busy-waiting mechanisms and are suitable for both producer-consumer and reader-writer problems. Additionally, semaphores support priority inheritance to prevent issues with priority inversion.
They were called Semaphores.
the differents is the bathroom time