Here's a better question: Would the hundreds of millions of jobs created by the computer industry disappearing due to a computer ban ever be offset by creating menial jobs that are currently done by automated processes handled by computers?
The hype that computers are replacing man is a silly notion. Computers are taking menial jobs that were carried out poorly or inefficiently by man. If this wasn't the case, computers would be doing everybody's jobs. This increases efficiency, lowers consumer prices, and creates a healthier and more competetive market.
Computing in a broad sense is a field that employs an unfathomable number of people-- Banning the computer industry means people ranging from database managers to watch assembly employees would lose their jobs. Consider the damage vs. gain.
world bank banned satyam computers for 8 years on account of data theft. world bank banned satyam computers for 8 years on account of data theft.
zoos should not be banned
The Civil Rights Act of 1968
Because he disgraced the computers.
they should be banned because there very unhealthy
no the royal family should not be banned
yes i think that it should be banned.
Cigarettes should be banned because they can damage your lungs.
Why Would It Be Banned? , No
Large cars should be or should not be banned in India
Hunting will never be banned and should not be.
Fireworks should not be banned! But if they were to be banned, it would be because they can be dangerous and can cause a house to catch on fire. But still they should not be banned!