No.
DHCP (Dynamic Host Control Protocol) is a method of providing clients network information from a router or DHCP server. It can tell a host what their IP address is, what the gateway is, what the DNS servers are, WINS servers, etc.
NAT (Network Address Translation) is the technology used by a gateway that allows a private ip address to access information on the public internet.
For example, You have a router (10.0.0.1) that acts as a DHCP server and DNS server. Something connects to your network and broadcasts a DHCP request, and is then given an ip address (10.0.0.5 for example) and told where to go to resolve domain names.
That client wants to connect to Google, it makes the request first to the name server through the gateway, and then information is sent back to the gateway. NAT Allows the gateway to get the information to the correct computer behind it even though it is not directly accessable. (Google can not directly access 10.0.0.5 and vice versa)
Using NAT a computer fails to locate a DHCP server . NAT is method that provide mapping between private and universal addresses. Network address translation also supports VPN .
Using NAT a computer fails to locate a DHCP server . NAT is method that provide mapping between private and universal addresses. Network address translation also supports VPN .
Exactly the same thing DHCP (Dynamic Host Control Protocol) provides for any other operating system administrator.Most, if not all, Linux distros come with a dhcp client in the basic installation.
Nat Wolff and Nat Wolf are the same person.Nat Wolf is just mispelled.
It is what... DHCP is designed to automatically distributed IP addresses to connected to the same network devices.
Yes. The client will renew the same address lease for as long as the DHCP server allows.
HiBoth are in same process but different. which mean NAT traversal techniques that establish and maintain IP connections traversing NAT.
DHCP Relay, called a helper-address in Cisco systems.
The only way that could work is if the DHCP service and the HTTP service were configured and running on the same physical machine. Otherwise they could not use the same IP address. DHCP and HTTP do not have to be on separate machines (but it is a good idea to separate them in a network). A better question might be why the two services *require* the same IP address.
WIndows and non-Windows systems install DHCP in different ways, but the basic idea is the same group of steps:Add the DHCP service role to the systemActivate the serviceAdd the scope of IP addresses and exclusions to the DHCP serviceActivate the scopeOff you go - addresses!
yes, one can configure two dhcp server on a same network. But for doing this, one has to define different scopes in both dhcp server in order to avoid ip address conflict. Eg. one can configure a scope for a lan with network address of 10.0.0.0 as- 10.0.0.10- 10.0.0.100 in one dhcp server. while other scope would be 10.0.0.101-10.0.0.200 . In this way we can have to dhcp servers on a same network. Which ever dhcp server receives the request for the ip address will provide the ip address. IN case for servers, one can use mac bindingin both servers so that they obtain same ip address
they both run on the same port number