0
How do the Federal Rules of Evidence address the originality of computer data in relation to the best evidence rule?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
The Federal Rules of Evidence exist so that juries are presented with fair sets of evidence by which to evaluate cases and hand down the fairest decisions. When computer data is relevant to these cases, the best and most complete data is still expected and necessary to the case. Original data is always required, when possible to obtain and applicable to the case.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The examination of bitemark evidence and its relation to a criminal investigation is known as?
Forensic Odontology
What was Sherlock Holmes first piece of evidence?
The relation between the fact that there was blood everywhere, yet no wound.
What examination of bite mark evidence and its relation to a criminal investigation is known as?
The examination of bite mark evidence in relation to a criminal investigation is known as forensic odontology. This field involves the analysis and comparison of bite marks found on a victim or at a crime scene to potential suspects through dental records or bite mark patterns. The goal is to provide valuable evidence to aid in identifying or eliminating suspects in criminal cases.
What is the relation between medical and electromagnetic?
There is no relation between medical uses of electromagnetic energy and alternative devices. There are no available scientific evidence to support claims in treating any diseases with the use of electromagnetism.
A Foucault pendulum provides evidence of Earth's?
rotation. The swinging motion of the pendulum appears to change over time due to the rotation of the Earth beneath it, demonstrating the Earth's rotation in relation to the pendulum. This phenomenon is known as the Coriolis effect.
Elisabeth Röhm related to Ernst Rohm?
Possibly, but I found no evidence of a relation on the Internet. It must be remembered that if Elisabeth is related to Ernst, she did not ask for it and would probably not be bragging about it.
Were in the us is there evidence that continents moving relative to one another?
The San Andreas Fault in California is a well-known location in the U.S. where evidence of continental movement can be observed. Along this fault line, the Pacific Plate is moving northwestward in relation to the North American Plate, causing earthquakes and other geological phenomena.
How big are gay people's hypothalamus?
Neurobiological research related to sexual orientation in humans is only just gathering momentum, but the evidence already shows that humans have a vast array of brain differences, not only in relation to gender, but also in relation to sexual orientation
Is Toby Hemingway related to Ernest Hemingway?
There is no known family relation between Toby Hemingway and Ernest Hemingway. They do share the same last name, but there is no evidence to suggest they are directly related.
How should Christians use archaeology in relation to apologetics?
Many times the Bible speaks of certain places, peoples, people, items, and events. Through archeology, apologetics can have evidence to prove the accuracy of the Bible.
What does the phrase 'absence of evidence is not evidence of absence' mean in relation to discoveries supporting the Bible?
== == New archaeological and other types of discoveries are being made all the time that support the truth of the Bible. The phrase you quote simply means that just because we can't presently prove something from the Bible with physical evidence, it doesn't mean that such evidence does not exist, it may simply mean that we have not yet discovered it. This term is used as a counter-argument to many who try to argue illogically that because something has not been discovered apart from its mention in the Bible it therefore is not true. This is stated in summary form as 'absence of evidence is evidence of absence.' The assumption behind this is that the Bible is a lot of 'campfire tales' and 'Mythology' and where it tells of people they are far removed from the events and so cannot know of what they speak with any accuracy. However, there now have been many archaeological discoveries made which verify historical, lifestyle and other details from the Biblical records. The fact that these had not yet been discovered did not make the Bible any more or less true than it was before. All that can be logically concluded when there is no extra-biblical evidence yet available is that there is no extra-biblical evidence yet available on a particular subject. To use an illustration from everyday life may help clarify the issue further and demonstrate how the argument when used in its reverse form, is most illogical. The assertion 'absence of evidence is evidence of absence' cannot be applied to any unknown discovery or else the following propositions would be true: Since William Herschel discovered Uranus in 1781 it did not exist until then because evidence of its existence was absent. Since Neptune was not discovered until September 23rd 1846 by Galle and Arrest it did not exist until then, since there was no real evidence. Pluto didn't exist until 1930 when it was discovered by Clyde W. Tombaugh, since there was no evidence of its existence. The same kind of assertions have been made and continue to be made against historical and other Biblical details. There continue to be discoveries made which confirm the accuracy of the Biblical record. The evidence was always there, it simply had not come to light. "Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence" means it's not a fact until proven otherwise. The above answer would certainly be a correct proposition if there is clarity given to the phrase 'it's not a fact.' If this means it's not a fact that the Bible has been proven wrong simply due to a lack of evidence in certain areas then this would be a true and correct proposition. If it means that it's not a fact that the Bible has been proven true simply because there is no evidence in a particular area then the proposition is logically flawed for reasons given above. Firstly, the Bible has been verified in numerous areas in which not that many years age it was thought to be in error. Thus, even though the evidence was relatively recently discovered the Bible was correct even without the evidence. The evidence just confirmed what was already correct. In addition, if evidence is required for everything then we may well not believe that man landed on the moon (indeed some think it was a big hoax) since we didn't see it directly. We take it 'on faith' to a certain degree because there is enough evidence. It is not unreasonable to take some things from the Bible 'on faith' without direct evidence since the writers have proven themselves reliable elsewhere. On the other hand, were the same ultra-skepticism to be applied to many other ancient writings, we would have very little of antiquity left as the Bible has much more and better 'evidence.' == == == ==
Is their any relation between foot size and penis size?
There is no scientific evidence to suggest a correlation between foot size and penis size. These physical traits are determined by different genetic factors and do not have a direct relationship.
