NO. THE UNIVERSAL LAW STILL APPLIES -- ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED NOR DESTROYED -- ONLY TRANSFORMED.
Actually in amplifier we give it the Vcc,Vee,Vbb which is such value from which the gain of an amplifier cannot increase till the point of Vcc,it holds the law of conservation of energy but if gain reaches to Vcc then it is in cutoff region so,never the amplification process violate the law of conservation of energy
Actually in amplifer we want the required phase shift+amount of required voltage from sources present so this is actually the use of amplifier that it enhances our strength over particular shape waveform and magnitude at required point
First law of thermodynamics: energy cannot be created nor destroyed.
Energy can not be created or destroyed, it only changes form.
camputer virus law
The term used to indicate that those in power are not above the law is rule of the law. This is considered to nomocracy where the law is the superior governing authority in a nation.
Moore's Law is the law that describes that on average, computers double their capacity every 18 to 24 months.
No, burning wood does not violate the law of conservation of energy. The energy stored in the wood is released as heat and light during combustion, but the total energy in the system remains constant.
No, it does not violate the law of conservation of energy. When a particle falls, its potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. The total energy (potential + kinetic) remains constant, demonstrating the conservation of energy.
no it does not violate the law of conservation of energy as energy is not lost/destroyed but transferred to the brakes of the truck.
I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.
No, interference and diffraction do not violate the law of conservation of energy. These phenomena involve the redistribution of energy within a wave system, rather than a loss or gain of energy. Energy is conserved overall, with changes in intensity occurring as a result of constructive and destructive interference processes.
No. So far this has not been possible. Since a "gravity shield" would make it possible to violate the law of conservation of energy, it is probably not possible, either.No. So far this has not been possible. Since a "gravity shield" would make it possible to violate the law of conservation of energy, it is probably not possible, either.No. So far this has not been possible. Since a "gravity shield" would make it possible to violate the law of conservation of energy, it is probably not possible, either.No. So far this has not been possible. Since a "gravity shield" would make it possible to violate the law of conservation of energy, it is probably not possible, either.
No, the production of waste energy during energy transformations does not violate the law of conservation of energy. The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted from one form to another. So, the waste energy generated during transformations is simply a form of energy that has been converted into a less useful form.
no Nothing violates that law.
no Nothing violates that law.
It isn't entirely clear what you mean with "perpetual machine". If you mean the old dream of the "perpetuum mobile", such a machine would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy; there are various reasons to assume that this law can't be violated:* Despite lots of attempts, by thousands of ingenious inventors, and over centuries, nobody has managed to violate Conservation of Energy so far. * Violating Conservation of Energy would also violate lots of other laws of physics, which are generally considered to be true. For example, Conservation of Mass, and Conservation of Momentum. * By Nöther's Theorem, the possibility that the amount of energy changes over time would be equivalent to the laws of physics changing over time! - Nowadays, the Law of Conservation of Energy is normally derived from Nöther's Theorem.
Energy conservation law states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only transformed. The thermal energy can be converted into chemical energy, but the total amount of energy will remain the same. Therefore, 200 kJ of thermal energy cannot be converted into 300 kJ of chemical energy.
Perpetual motion is the concept of a hypothetical machine that operates indefinitely without any external source of energy. In reality, the laws of thermodynamics dictate that perpetual motion machines are impossible because they violate the principle of conservation of energy.