answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Compounds with covalent bonds are generally more dangerous more open flames, because they are more likely to combust. Ionic compounds such as salt usually do not react as nearly much to flame. This results due to the different natures of the bonds.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

7mo ago

Ionic compounds would be more dangerous near fire because they tend to dissociate into their constituent ions when in high temperatures, leading to potentially explosive reactions. Covalent compounds are less likely to undergo such rapid and violent reactions in the presence of fire.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Covalent...they are more likely to combust.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

covalent compounds

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would be more dangerous near fire ionic or covalent compound?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is chlorine oxide ionic or compound?

Chlorine oxide would be a covalent compound, and not an ionic compound.


Is NBr3 an ionic or covalent compound?

NBr3 is a covalent compound. It consists of nonmetals (N and Br) which typically form covalent bonds by sharing electrons.


Would silicon and nitrogen form an ionic compound?

Silicon and nitrogen typically do not form an ionic compound as both elements are nonmetals and tend to share electrons to form covalent bonds. In this case, they are more likely to form covalent compounds rather than an ionic compound.


Would bromine and carbon make an ionic compound?

No, bromine and carbon would not form an ionic compound. Carbon typically forms covalent bonds and bromine can also form both covalent and ionic bonds, depending on the element it is reacting with. In this case, a covalent bond would be more likely between bromine and carbon.


Is BrCl an ionic or covalent compound?

BrCl is a covalent compound. It is composed of bromine (Br) and chlorine (Cl) atoms, which share electrons to form covalent bonds.


Is p2o4 ionic or covalent?

Phosphorus(III) oxide, P2O4, is a covalent compound. It is composed of nonmetals (phosphorus and oxygen) that share electrons to form covalent bonds.


Would Mn and Cl form a covalent compound?

No, Mn and Cl would likely not form a covalent compound. Manganese (Mn) typically forms ionic compounds, while chlorine (Cl) is a highly electronegative element that typically forms ionic compounds as well. Therefore, they would most likely form an ionic compound rather than a covalent one.


Would an ionic or covalent compound be more conductive in water when dissolved Explain?

An ionic compound dissociated in water is an electrolyte and is of course more conductive..


Would magnesium and sulfur make an ionic compound?

No, magnesium and sulfur would not form an ionic compound because they are both nonmetals. Ionic compounds are formed between a metal and a nonmetal. Magnesium and sulfur would likely form a covalent compound instead.


Is P2H4 ionic or covalent?

P2H4 is a covalent compound. It is made up of nonmetals (phosphorus and hydrogen) which typically form covalent bonds by sharing electrons.


Is the C6H3CH3 compound ionic polar covalent or nonpolar covalent?

The compound C6H3CH3 is nonpolar covalent because it consists of only carbon and hydrogen atoms, which have similar electronegativities, leading to equal sharing of electrons between them.


Is N2s4 covalent or ionic?

N2S4 is covalent as it is composed of non-metal elements (nitrogen and sulfur) which typically form covalent bonds by sharing electrons. The compound does not contain any metal ions which would indicate ionic bonding.