answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Petroleum coke is cheaper than coal; therefore, the economics of the process can be improved by substituting coke for coal. Petroleum coke cannot simply be substituted 100% for coal due to hardness issues and combustibility issues. Usually an existing plant may use petroleum coke as a 20% substitute for existing coal use.

This results in problems. Now your workers have to handle both coal and coke separately and ensure the intended blend ratio is maintained in order to maintain operability.

There are specific materials handling issues than can make the discount less advantageous than is immediately apparent. Equipment such as cranes, conveyors, and crushers may frequently break down and may need to be spared in order to keep the process running. Also if the source of the petroleum coke is not locally available supply disruptions may occur based on price changes in petroleum coke (or in bunker fuel or marine diesel oil (MDO) which is used by the ships that carry coke). For instance shipping petroleum coke from the United States to China is only economical when petroleum coke is above a certain price is China.

Petroleum coke may also increase the SOx (sulfur dioxide or sulfur trioxide) emissions from the plant. Options to mitigate the emissions impact include buying higher priced, lower sulfur coal and/or coke to blend into the fuel mix. This negatively affects the economics of the original planned coke substitution.

In the case of a grassroots project designed to burn petroleum coke (such as a circulating fluidized boiler, (CFB) ), the economics can be much more favorable. Even in this case environmental permitting issues and petroleum coke supply issues should be evaluated before starting the project. Due to recent concerns with carbon dioxide regulations and ever more strict sulfur emissions regulations, permitting solid fuel boilers has become more difficult throughout the world; however, the economics of using petroleum coke can still pay off depending on the required payback period of the project.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the pros and cons of using petroleum coke?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Chemical Engineering
Related questions

Pros and cons of petroleum?

go browns


What are pros and cons of using benzene?

The pros of benzene is apple and the cons of benzene is banana.


What are the pros and cons of using lng?

Pros green safe non corrosive odorless nontoxic CONS nonrenewable


What are the pros and cons of using gasoline powered cars?

Pros: Car moves Cons: Car pollutes atmosphere


What are the pros and cons of petroleum?

Petroleum is good, as it can be cracked and polymerised into other use full chemicals, it is bad because drilling from the ground is expensive


What are the pros and cons of using an HVAC system in a residential building?

pros comfort cons no comfort if you want to heat or cool you will be using some form of hvac


How to make sentence using pros and cons?

After weighing up the pros and cons, Albert decided against buying a new car.


What are the pros and cons of laser for using on bikinie area?

THE PROS ARE THAT YOU DO NOT HAVE TO SHAVE DOWN THERE ANYMORE. THE CONS ARE THEY MIGHT MISS AND ZAPP YOUR ROSE BUD.


What are some of the pros and cons of computer assisted communication technology and computer assisted decision aiding technology?

pros using a computer pros using a computer pros using a computer


What are the pros and cons of using a market intermediary?

What are the pros and cons of using a market intermediary?


The pros and cons of physiocrats?

The physiocrats were an 18th-century group of French economists who believed in the importance of agriculture as the primary source of wealth in society. Their main pro was their focus on the natural order of the economy and the idea that wealth came from the land. However, their main con was their limited view of economic activity, as they often overlooked the role of manufacturing and trade in creating wealth. Additionally, their ideas were not always practical or easily implemented in complex modern economies.


Pros and cons of jury selection?

what were the pros and cons for the nulification