rtd
rtd
Question is way too broad. Depends on when and in what part of the world.
The social and economic battles fought during the civil war began with the Souths dependence on slave labor. Their economy depended on the good picked and farmed by the slave. The end of slavery threatened that way of life.
Most of the major battles did take place in Virginia, however there were battles and skirmishes that were fought from New Mexico all the way to Vermont.
what the heck are you talking about, Alexander fought in the war from Egypt all the way to Turkey, but he failed to conquer britannica, which is Britain
there was no fighting, this was a stuggle between countiresAnswerThere was a lot of fighting, and millions died around the world, but there was no direct fighting between the global nuclear powers. It was fought with conventional weapons and tactics in places like Korea and Vietnam. It was fought with diplomacy. It was fought with Economics. It was fought with submarines. It was fought with spy satellites, spy planes, spy ships, and spies on the ground. It was fought with movies, television, radio, and newspapers. It was fought in every way you can think of except with nuclear bombs.
The Korean War was, in a way, a draw - in that it stopped with a cease fire in 1952, and has been in that official status ever since.
There was really no one place that Caesar fought most of his battles, but Gaul had the edge because of the large amount of territory Caesar added. But remember, in Gaul, even though Caesar fought battles there, he did not have to fight his way into and out of the area. Many tribes quickly surrendered to him or even sent ambassadors to him to negotiate a surrender/peace. Caesar also fought in the mid east, Africa and Spain and at the time of his death he had plans drawn up for a campaign against the Parthians.
there was no fighting, this was a stuggle between countiresAnswerThere was a lot of fighting, and millions died around the world, but there was no direct fighting between the global nuclear powers. It was fought with conventional weapons and tactics in places like Korea and Vietnam. It was fought with diplomacy. It was fought with economics. It was fought with submarines. It was fought with spy satellites, spy planes, spy ships, and spies on the ground. It was fought with movies, television, radio, and newspapers. It was fought in every way you can think of except with nuclear bombs.
The way the Romans fought had hardly had any influence in the way other generations fought. In The Early Middle Ages warfare was carried out by a cavalry made up of medieval aristocrats. The Romans fought mainly with infantries. Over time new military technology came about, especially cannons and rifles which revolutionised warfare. Contemporary warfare is even more remote from the Romans. They did not have lorries, jeeps, tanks, aircrafts, submarines and the like. The only remnant of Roman warfare in the Early Middle Ages was the adoption of catapults which were similar to the Roman onager. The only influence on subsequent warfare was the study of the tactics of the great Roman battles in military academies. However, those of the Greeks, Persians and other civilisation are also studied.
Both were extremely costly and bloody in terms of human life.However, okinawa was fought between the Americans and Japanese on pacific island.And Stalingrad was fought during the winter on the eurasian steppe between the Russians and Germans.