Ironclads are not the same thing as submarines. Ironclads do not go underwater completely even though the majority of their body may be underwater.
their not
They have the same shape and travel thru the same elements.
naval submarines do not have a thing to do in those lakes but the recovery submarine type robot that searches ocacionally is brought to seek for sunken vessels in the past.
Submarines are not barbaric weapons. However, some tactics, such as unwarned attacks were considered by some during WWII as barbaric. As with most things, the thing is not bad, but how it is applied can be.
They work off the same principle of magnets.
This is a hard question to answer... Almost all nations have submarines, but I am not sure if they have all used them in the same war. I would be they all used them in WW2 or the cold war
The submarines in WW2 are different from now. I have done research and back then submarines were easily sunk and were ran differently ! How were they ran differently ? Back then in WW2 the submarines used, were smaller ... They were ran by Diesel engines which allowed them to high surface speed and long range, but underwater it was very difficult and the speed and range wasn't the same from out of the water.
They are mapped by sonar. The same technology they use to detect submarines from battleships / carriers.
1. Ballistic submarines 2. Attack submarines
Answer US submarines were named after fish and sea creatures, the letter starting with the same letter as the class name, for example: Salmon Class, USS Skipjack, Tambor Class, USS Thresher.
Boats, Subs, Submarines, Home.