Fossil records, anatomical similarities, embryological development, and genetic similarities are all forms of evidence that support the theory of evolution. These pieces of evidence show the gradual changes in species over time and provide support for the idea that all organisms are related through common ancestry.
The endosymbiotic theory is widely accepted as a strong scientific hypothesis; however, definitive proof is challenging due to the lack of direct observational evidence from billions of years ago when the theorized events occurred. While there is substantial supporting evidence, such as the similarities between organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts with free-living bacteria, the theory cannot be definitively proven beyond any doubt.
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various fields such as genetics, comparative anatomy, embryology, and the fossil record. This evidence consistently supports the idea that species evolve over time through natural selection, providing a strong scientific basis for his theory. Furthermore, Darwin's theory has been tested and verified through ongoing research and observation, further solidifying its credibility in the scientific community.
Endosymbiosis theory is based on the idea that certain organelles within eukaryotic cells, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts, were once free-living prokaryotic organisms that were engulfed by a host cell through a symbiotic relationship, eventually becoming a permanent part of the cell. This theory is supported by evidence such as the presence of these organelles having their own DNA, ribosomes, and replication machinery like prokaryotic cells.
The endosymbiotic theory is a scientific hypothesis that proposes that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different types of prokaryotic cells. Specifically, it suggests that organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts were once independent prokaryotic organisms that were engulfed by larger cells and developed a mutually beneficial relationship. This theory is supported by evidence such as the similarities between organelles and certain types of bacteria.
There is no evidence supporting it, and all the more evidence supporting the less controversial models of human evolution, based on evolutionary theory.
me and your mom
No. A theory is more certain: it is a hypothesis which has had some supporting evidence.
Lynn Margulis is the American biologist known for her work on the endosymbiotic theory. She proposed that chloroplasts and mitochondria evolved from ancient prokaryotic cells that were engulfed by a host cell. Her research provided evidence supporting the idea that these organelles have their own DNA and replicate independently within eukaryotic cells.
osama bin laden and adolf Hitler
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
Fossil records, anatomical similarities, embryological development, and genetic similarities are all forms of evidence that support the theory of evolution. These pieces of evidence show the gradual changes in species over time and provide support for the idea that all organisms are related through common ancestry.
The 'big bang' theory.
The endosymbiotic theory is widely accepted as a strong scientific hypothesis; however, definitive proof is challenging due to the lack of direct observational evidence from billions of years ago when the theorized events occurred. While there is substantial supporting evidence, such as the similarities between organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts with free-living bacteria, the theory cannot be definitively proven beyond any doubt.
for all using Plato the answer is G) all of the above.
the two scientists that brought forth supporting his evidence was South African Geologist Alexander Du Toit and Swiss geologist Emile Argand.
the earliest humans evolved in the rift valley in africa