In "short," yes. But only if you want to illuminate something with very small-scale features, like (magnified) baby's hair. You would see it more sharply under blue light than under longer-wavelength red.
For coarser-featured scenes, which include most every-day things, the wavelength of the illumination source, in itself, doesn't matter nearly as much as the color content of the scene. Example: if a scene has a lot of red in it, it will show up better ("apparent resolution") under red light than under blue light, simply because more of it will respond to the matching red light source. (Overall, most scenes show up best with white, or many wavelengthed, light.)
But something the width of a fine hair or smaller does better under blue light because the size of such things is in the ballpark of visible light's wavelength. For light to illuminate something, its wavelength should be NO LONGER than around one hundredth the width of the smallest feature (e.g., the tiny cracks or dents in a hair.) Here, the shorter the wavelength, the better.
The formula for calculating the microscopic resolution is given by resolution = 0.61 x wavelength / numerical aperture. The resolution is the ability of a microscope to distinguish between two points in an image. It is influenced by the wavelength of light used and the numerical aperture of the microscope lens.
The limiting factor to a light microscope is its resolution, which is the ability to distinguish between two separate points in an image. Light microscopes are limited by the wavelength of visible light, which limits their resolution to around 200 nanometers. This means that they cannot visualize structures smaller than this limit.
The relationship between light wavelength and photosynthetic rate is governed by the absorption spectrum of chlorophyll, the pigment responsible for photosynthesis. Chlorophyll absorbs blue and red light most efficiently, while green light is least absorbed. Therefore, light wavelengths in the blue and red spectrum tend to have a greater impact on photosynthetic rate compared to green light.
You should shake the end of the rope rapidly to make the wavelength shorter. Increasing the frequency of the wave by shaking it rapidly will decrease the distance between consecutive crests, thus shortening the wavelength.
Tobin can conclude that the reaction rate is directly proportional to the enzyme concentration when excess substrate is present. This is because at higher enzyme concentrations, all substrate molecules are already bound to enzyme active sites, leading to a maximal reaction rate even with excess substrate.
The relationship between frequency and wavelength is inversely proportional. This means that as the frequency of a wave increases, its wavelength decreases, and vice versa. Mathematically, this relationship can be expressed as: frequency = speed of light / wavelength.
The two are inversely proportional.
Wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional.
Diffraction is the bending of light waves around obstacles. The amount of diffraction that occurs is dependent on the wavelength of light - shorter wavelengths result in less diffraction and better resolution, while longer wavelengths result in more diffraction and poorer resolution. This relationship is governed by the principle that the size of the diffracted pattern is directly proportional to the wavelength of light.
The relationship between frequency and wavelength is inverse: as frequency increases, wavelength decreases, and vice versa. This is because frequency and wavelength are inversely proportional in a wave, such as in electromagnetic waves.
The frequency and wavelength of electromagnetic waves are inversely proportional. This means that as the frequency increases, the wavelength decreases, and vice versa. This relationship is described by the equation: speed of light = frequency x wavelength.
-- Wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional. -- When you multiply them together, the product is the speed of the wave.
Wavelength is the distance between successive points in a wave that are in phase. In general, shorter wavelengths correspond to higher frequencies and higher energy levels. The relationship between wavelength, frequency, and speed of a wave is governed by the wave equation, with wavelength being inversely proportional to frequency.
The frequency and wavelength of an electromagnetic wave are inversely proportional - as frequency increases, wavelength decreases, and vice versa. This relationship is described by the equation: speed of light = frequency x wavelength.
The relationship between wavelength and energy per photon is inverse: shorter wavelengths correspond to higher energy photons, according to the equation E = hc/λ, where E is energy, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and λ is wavelength.
The relationship between wave speed in deep water and wavelength is called the phase speed. This is the speed at which the phase of a wave propagates, determined by the wavelength and the properties of the medium. In deep water, the phase speed is directly proportional to the wavelength.
The wave speed is directly proportional to both the wavelength and frequency of a wave. This relationship is described by the equation speed = frequency × wavelength. In other words, as the frequency or wavelength of a wave increases, the wave speed will also increase.