0
Both identify a person, the DNA more conclusively because fingerprints are often smeared or partials. A fingerprint has one advantage over DNA if it can be classified as where and when it was made, which can establish a person's presence in a given circumstance. For example, if a fingerprint is in the blood on a weapon, it could only have been made after the blood was there.
Both fingerprints and DNA are valuable forms of forensic evidence, but their usefulness can vary depending on the situation. Fingerprint evidence is more readily available at crime scenes and can be matched to individuals with certainty. DNA evidence can provide more detailed information about a person's identity and can be used for a wider range of analyses, such as determining familial relationships. Ultimately, the effectiveness of each type of evidence depends on the circumstances of the case.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A pattern of bands made up of specific DNA fragments is a?
DNA fingerprint
Which phrase is true for a DNA fingerprint?
A DNA fingerprint is a unique pattern of DNA fragments that can be used to identify individuals.
Are a DNA fingerprint and a genetic fingerprint the same?
Yes, a DNA fingerprint and a genetic fingerprint refer to the same thing. They are both unique patterns in an individual's DNA that can be used for identification purposes.
Why is DNA fingerprint more conclusive when proving a person's innocence rather than their guilt?
ANS1:Because it is technically possible for more than one person to have a similar DNA fingerprint, but it is impossible for someone to have their DNA fingerprint change. So if your fingerprint is:XXYYXYXAnd the guilty persons DNA is:XXXXYYYIt is impossible for you to be the guilty person. But, it is possible that my DNA fingerprint is also XXXXYYY - so please don't commit any crimes near my house or I might get nailed for it.ANS2:DNA fingerprinting always has a margin of error. The error can introduce reasonable doubt. Guilt in a capital case must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
How is the DNA fingerprint different from the other fingerprints?
A DNA fingerprint is based on an individual's unique genetic code, obtained from analyzing DNA samples. This type of fingerprint provides information about a person's genetic identity and can be used for identification and forensic purposes. On the other hand, other types of fingerprints, like those obtained from scans of patterns on the skin's surface, are based on physical characteristics and are used for identification purposes as well.
Why is fingerprint better than iodine?
fingerprint spray is better than iodine because iodine can smudge the fingerprint but the fingerprint makes it clear.
A pattern of bands made up of specific DNA fragments is a?
DNA fingerprint
How is a DNA FINGERPRINT PRODUCES?
Selected fragments are used to produce a DNA fingerprint.
What does DNA fingerprint shows?
A DNA fingerprint refers to the fact that a person's DNA code is as unique to that person as his/her fingerprint. A person can be implicated for a crime or ruled out as the criminal based on his/her DNA code.
Why is fingerprint spray better than iodine?
Fingerprint spray is better than iodine because it is easier to use, quicker to develop prints, and provides clearer and more detailed results. Fingerprint spray also minimizes the risk of damaging evidence and is less toxic compared to iodine fuming.
What is a DNA fingerprint who can have the same DNA fingerprint as yours?
A DNA fingerprint is really all the genes that are found in in your chromosomes. No two are ever alike except for identical twins (or triplets).
Which phrase is true for a DNA fingerprint?
A DNA fingerprint is a unique pattern of DNA fragments that can be used to identify individuals.
When comparing the DNA fingerprints of a parent and child the parent's DNA fingerprint must have?
Shared genetic markers with the child's DNA fingerprint, indicating a biological relationship.
Are a DNA fingerprint and a genetic fingerprint the same?
Yes, a DNA fingerprint and a genetic fingerprint refer to the same thing. They are both unique patterns in an individual's DNA that can be used for identification purposes.
Why is it easier to establish innocence than it is to establish guilt in DNA?
ANS1:Because it is technically possible for more than one person to have a similar DNA fingerprint, but it is impossible for someone to have their DNA fingerprint change. So if your fingerprint is:XXYYXYXAnd the guilty persons DNA is:XXXXYYYIt is impossible for you to be the guilty person. But, it is possible that my DNA fingerprint is also XXXXYYY - so please don't commit any crimes near my house or I might get nailed for it.ANS2:DNA fingerprinting always has a margin of error. The error can introduce reasonable doubt. Guilt in a capital case must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
Can DNA be taken from a fingerprint?
yes
What does a DNA fingerprint look like?
A DNA fingerprint is a pattern of bands that are obtained by separating a person's DNA fragments on a gel and then visualizing them. It appears as a series of dark bands of varying lengths. Each individual's DNA fingerprint is unique, like a genetic barcode.
