Do you believe the egg came first or the chicken? This question is very similar to the one you are asking... Either way you see this, the egg has to be living.. Just when a baby is just a fetus inside the mothers womb, there is a chick inside the egg which will eventually form and become a living organism in the world.. If you believe that it is nonliving you can also be correct, as whilst the chick is inside the egg it has not yet formed, and become a living organism as of such. Just as above, it take a period of time before the baby in the incubus also becomes living, so does the chick inside the egg. Hopefully this answers your question.
A cell phone is considered non-living because it does not exhibit characteristics of living organisms such as growth, reproduction, metabolism, and response to stimuli. It is a man-made object that relies on external sources of energy to function.
The cell wall is the non-living part of a plant cell that provides structural support and protection. Made of cellulose, it maintains the cell's shape and prevents it from collapsing.
Water, ions (such as sodium, potassium, and calcium), and gases (such as oxygen and carbon dioxide) are three non-living substances found within a cell.
A mutation in a sex cell, such as a sperm or egg cell, can be passed on to offspring and affect future generations. In contrast, a mutation in a non-sex cell will only affect the individual and is not passed on to offspring.
an egg is an egg... meaning an egg is basically a sex cell, made of all the cell organelles and since only non living things can be made of molecules (which makes up atoms) it cant be made of molecules so when you eat an omelet you are eating the reproductive organ of whatever bird it came from
If it remains unfertilised it is non living. However at the start of its existence it holds the potential to become part of a living thing.
If it remains unfertilised it is non living. However at the start of its existence it holds the potential to become part of a living thing.
If it remains unfertilised it is non living. However at the start of its existence it holds the potential to become part of a living thing.
Non living
no. lots of people feel its wrong to eat a chicken egg thinking that it may be a baby chick. a chicken egg you buy at a shop is a non-fertilised egg and therefore is non-living. in some parts of the world they sell fertilised eggs where people boil the alive chick inside the egg to kill it and then eat it. they are eating unborn chickens but it doesnt happen in England super-mrket eggs.
Robert Hooke observed the first non-living cell.
Living
living
living
The egg came first. The first egg containing a genetic mutation that resulted in a chicken hatched from a non-chicken ancestor. This genetic mutation led to the birth of the first chicken, making the egg the predecessor to the chicken.
How can we apply the cell theory to better understand living and non living things
no it isn't because the cell wall of the cell is a non-living part of the cell and because the cell wall of the cell has no function on its own so that is why they are treated as a non-living part of the cell.