Then all the animals that are connected somehow to the grass will be extinct.
Example: Grass--deer--lion
If there is no grass then the deer won't have things to eat and it will be extinct and the lion won't have anything to eat so it will also be extinct.
some of the organisms won't change because they eat something else like berries and fruits instead of grass won't really be affected. But if something that eats that organism also eats grass then that organism might increase because there would only be half of their predators left anyways it's complicated.
If grasshoppers were removed from an ecosystem, it could disrupt the food chain as grasshoppers serve as a food source for various predators like birds, lizards, and rodents. This could lead to a decrease in predator populations and imbalance the ecosystem. Additionally, grasshoppers play a role in nutrient cycling through their feeding habits, so their removal could affect the soil quality.
Without first-level consumers, there would be an imbalance in the ecosystem. This would lead to overpopulation of primary producers, resulting in competition for resources and potential ecosystem collapse. Higher-level consumers would also be affected due to lack of food sources.
If decomposers were removed from a habitat, dead organic matter would not be broken down and recycled back into the ecosystem. This would lead to a buildup of dead material, decreased nutrient availability for plants, and disruption of energy flow within the ecosystem. Overall, it would have a negative impact on the health and balance of the ecosystem.
The population of rock dwelling lizards would likely decline significantly as they lose their primary habitat and source of protection. Without rocks to hide under, they would be more vulnerable to predators and face difficulties in finding shelter and regulating their body temperature effectively. This disruption could lead to a decrease in their numbers and potential local extinction.
If the ochre sea star were removed from the ecosystem, shellfish populations could increase significantly. Ochre sea stars are predators of shellfish, and without them, shellfish could thrive unchecked, leading to potential overgrazing of algae and other organisms in the ecosystem. This could disrupt the balance of the ecosystem and impact other species dependent on these resources.
Removing grasses and shrubs from a rural New Jersey ecosystem will likely disrupt the habitat for many species that depend on them for food and shelter, leading to a decrease in biodiversity. It may also result in increased soil erosion and reduced water infiltration, impacting the overall ecosystem health.
bird
nothing it depends on what factor was removed
if grasshoppers were removed which would suffer the most a bird or a baboon
the fishes and seals will increased
Without first-level consumers, there would be an imbalance in the ecosystem. This would lead to overpopulation of primary producers, resulting in competition for resources and potential ecosystem collapse. Higher-level consumers would also be affected due to lack of food sources.
The ecosystem will be unbalance.
The entire ecosystem would fail
the fish will die . because the fish needed by theplants which qive oxygen .. !
The endocrine system would be affected which, in turn, affects just about every other body system.
ello im sara
The ecosystem would not be successful. Eg, plants are eaten by deer. If the plants were removed, the deer would have to look for another food or die.
What would happen if grasses and shrubs were removed from an ecosystem? A.the primary consumers would increaseB.the primary consumers would become secondary consumersC.the primary consumers would die out or move elsewhereD.the primary consumers would stay unchanged