Minor adaptations and changes, as can be observed in living things today, are of course not denied or disproved by Creationism. What Creationism does deny is the notion that Evolution could bring about new species or even new organs.
See also:
No, creationism and adaptation are not mutually exclusive concepts. Creationism is a belief in a divine creator, while adaptation is a scientific process by which organisms change over time to better survive in their environment. Many people believe that adaptation is evidence of intelligent design by a divine creator.
Evolution and creationism are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Evolution is supported by scientific evidence, while creationism is a belief based on religious teachings. Many people reconcile the two by viewing evolution as the mechanism by which a higher power, such as God, created life.
Creationism, as a belief, a philosophy and a mindset, would be defined as an abstract noun; creationism as an event or a process would be a concrete noun. Nouns have no opposites; you cannot get "negative-creation" in the same way as you can get 1 and -1.
Creationism is the belief that life and the universe were created by a supernatural being, typically in the religious sense, rather than through natural processes like evolution. Creationism often rejects scientific explanations for the origin of life and promotes the idea of a divine creator.
Creationism is the belief that the universe and living organisms originate from specific acts of divine creation, as opposed to the scientific theory of evolution. Creationism often involves beliefs based on religious texts that describe the origins of the world and humanity as being directly created by a deity.
Richard Dawkins, a prominent evolutionary biologist, is a staunch critic of Creationism. He argues that Creationism lacks scientific evidence and is incompatible with the theory of evolution. Dawkins believes that Creationism has no place in science classrooms and advocates for the teaching of evolution based on scientific evidence.
No where. Science has yet to prove or disprove Creationism
No. Because creationism is the belief a deity created life. If aliens were proved to exist, it would not negate it because there would still be no evidence to prove or disprove the fact they were also created by a deity.
Technically, there is no such thing as scientific creationism. Creationism is per definition un- or even anti-scientific.
Answer By definition creationism is theistic.
The ISBN of Creationism's Trojan Horse is 0195157427.
Fiat Creationism
Creationism's Trojan Horse has 416 pages.
Creationism's Trojan Horse was created on 2004-01-08.
Example sentence - The scientists were attempting to disprove the theory.
Yes, disprove is a synonym of belie.
No.
In Focus - 2009 Creationism was released on: USA: 10 December 2012