answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

This is a common question, and a common misconception. Unfortunately, most people are taught a hierarchy of certainty: hypothesis becomes theory and then, with more support, a theory becomes law. This is WRONG. Laws and theories serve different purposes and each have a unique nature.

The current consensus among philosophers of science seems to be this: * Laws are generalizations about what has happened, from which we can generalize about what we expect to happen. Laws describe. They pertain to observational data. The ability of the ancients to predict eclipses had nothing to do with whether they knew just how they happened; they had a law but not a theory. * Theories are explanations of observations (or of laws). The fact that we have a pretty good understanding of how stars explode doesn't necessarily mean we could predict the next supernova; we have a theory but not a law. William McComus lists gravity as a modern example of a well-established law for which no really satisfying theory is available. We can use the Law of Gravity, and even correct it for the effects of relativity (General Relativity), but we don't have any consensus notion of howit functions! Is it geometry or gravitons? Oddly enough, I searched the MadSci site and came up with a carefully- written wrong answer along the hierarchical lines you describe above. Embarassingly, several answers I summoned in my search fall into the misconceptions and traps enumerated by McComus! We shouldn't blame our experts; as you and I have seen from our own experience, scientists may have fuzzy notions about this sort of distinction because they don't normally have to make the distinction! A working scientists doesn't tend to worry about whether the First Law of Thermodynamics is an explanation, or the Theory of Evolution a statement of observed facts. They work, she uses them, everything's fine, right? But as McComus points out, the cut-and-dried (wrong) way this is usually presented can be pretty deadly, pedagogically. I am unable to recommend much specific for further reading, although McComus' bibliography looks to be a good place to start. You might try Richard Feynman's distinctly practical take on this problem, The Nature of Physical Law.
laws have been proven, theories are just ideas and have not been proven

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

βˆ™ 4mo ago

A scientific theory explains a phenomenon based on evidence and can evolve with new data, while a scientific law describes a consistent pattern in nature without explaining the underlying mechanism. Theories are more flexible and subject to change, while laws are generally considered to be universally true under specific conditions.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 13y ago

A theory is a well supported explanation and a law explains how thinks work in the natural world.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 15y ago

A theory is an idea that has yet to be proven by experimentation. A law is a theory that has been proven correct.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Distinguish between a theory and a law?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Biology

On the basis of gram reaction only can you distinguish between staphylococcus and streptococcus?

Staphylococcus is Gram-positive, forming clusters, while Streptococcus is also Gram-positive but forms chains or pairs. This difference in cell arrangement can help distinguish between the two genera based on Gram staining characteristics.


Distinguish between the cell theory and organism theory?

The cell theory states that all living organisms are composed of cells, while the organism theory suggests that cells are the building blocks of living organisms. In essence, the cell theory focuses on the fundamental unit of life being the cell, whereas the organism theory looks at how cells come together to form complete organisms.


What is the minimum time interval between 2 sounds for the Human ear to distinguish them?

The minimum time interval between two sounds for the human ear to distinguish them is about 10-20 milliseconds. This is known as the temporal resolution of the auditory system.


Evidence that supports the theory of evolution is called?

Fossil records, anatomical similarities, embryological development, and genetic similarities are all forms of evidence that support the theory of evolution. These pieces of evidence show the gradual changes in species over time and provide support for the idea that all organisms are related through common ancestry.


Which of these have been the most extensively tested theory law or hypothesis?

The theory of evolution by natural selection has been one of the most extensively tested theories in science. It has been supported by a vast array of evidence from multiple scientific disciplines, including paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Additionally, the theory has been able to make accurate predictions about the natural world, further confirming its validity.

Related questions

Distinguish between theory and law?

A theory is consistent and has known experiment results, but is often refined as new knowledge is found. A law is a mathematical relationship which has been found to be consistently true.


How would you distinguish a scientific theory from a scientific law?

By not doing nothing


How would you distinguish scientific theory from a scientific law?

By not doing nothing


How would you distinguish a scientific theory from scientific law?

By not doing nothing


Distinguish between concept and theory?

aariz wasim


What is the relationship between state and law?

Distinguish between a public law relationship and a private law relationship.


How wold you distinguish a scientific theory form a scientific law?

They're the same thing, but (usually) the "law" has an equation associated with it, while the "theory" is just a (verbal) discription.


How would you distinguish a scientific theory from a scientific law-?

A scientific theory is accepted as factual even though it hasn't been proven. A scientific law has been proven as fact.


What is the Difference between imperative theory and pure theory of law?

command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.


What is the difference between law an theory?

a law is something that is true and a theory is an opinion or thought that can be proven wrong.


What are the different between a scientists law and scientific theory?

law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea


What are the difference between a theory and a scientific theory?

law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea