After the man dies in "To Build a Fire," the dog snuggles up to the man's body for warmth before eventually venturing off into the wilderness in search of other humans or food. The dog instinctively knows that it needs to find a way to survive on its own now that the man is no longer able to provide for it.
He heads to camp in search of fire
His ability to make fire work on e2020 peeps
the man dies from his lack of imagination. i literally just answered this.
The relationship between the old man and the dog in "To Build a Fire" is one of survival and dependency. The old man is reliant on the dog for warmth and companionship, while the dog depends on the old man for direction and protection. Despite their differing instincts and needs, they both form a bond based on their shared struggle in the harsh environment.
The resolution of "To Build a Fire" by Jack London occurs when the man succumbs to the extreme cold and dies while trying to build a fire to save himself. His failure to heed the advice of the old-timer about traveling alone in such harsh conditions leads to his tragic demise. The story ends with the man realizing his impending death and accepting his fate.
"Man bites dog" ????
Jack London wrote "To Build a Fire" to illustrate the inherent conflict between man and nature, and to examine the consequences of underestimating the power of the natural world. The story serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of respecting and understanding the environment in order to survive in harsh conditions.
"To Build a Fire" by Jack London is a good example of London's take on naturalism. His view is that death is part of nature and man cannot stop it. If man were able to fight death, the man in the story would have been able to rebuild the fire and survive, but nature as fate prevailed by taking his life. This story also shows man's reliance on nature to survive, and nature's independence from man. The dog was an example of nature throughout the story. The man envied the dog for his ability to survive on his own without the need of fire or clothing. The dog waited on the man until he died because that's what he knew to do, but when he caught the scent of death from the man, he ran to the camp where he knew he could find food. This action shows that the dog did not need the man in order to survive.
The author describes how the dog exposes the man's lack of imagination. The man can't picture all the bad things that can happen in the wilderness, but the dog just knows things are bad. The comparison is like the dog's knowledge vs. the man's knowledge.
he build it underneath a tree apex
The lack of names for the man and the dog in "To Build a Fire" by Jack London adds to the story's theme of man versus nature. By remaining unnamed, the characters become more symbolic and representative of broader themes rather than individual personalities. This approach allows readers to focus on the struggle for survival and the harshness of the environment they face.
At the start of the journey in "To Build a Fire," the man is overconfident and dismissive of the danger, while the dog is instinctually cautious and aware of the harsh conditions. The man's attitude is characterized by arrogance and a lack of respect for nature, while the dog's attitude is one of survival instincts and respect for the environment.