0
Considering that this is a "Should" question, you will likely get dissenting opinions.
However, to clarify: Machiaevellian is the ideal that cunning and duplicity should be used to achieve political ends, and an idea that these ends justify whatever means were used to achieve them.
Answer 1 - No
The idea of Machieavellian machinations is entirely opposed to the transparency and human rights that fundamentally undergird the US political system. The transparency comes to the fore as regards politicians and legislation. When people elect a politician, they expect that politician to advocate what it is that he was voted into office for. This is as opposed to using one set of ideals when running, but implementing a wholly different set when governing. As concerns human rights, these inhibit the actions of government in such a way to protect the citizenry. Machiavellians have no objection to the use of torture provided such acts are either performed secretly (so that there is no negative reaction) or if torture is acceptable. Machiavellians are more concerned with the appearance of propiety than actual propiety, which would lead to increasing violations of civil liberties such as wiretaps, unlawful searches and seizures, and other issues.
Answer 2 - Yes
Often, the US public has very little idea of what it actually wants and desires. They vote in politicians often based on one statement, their supposed party, or the way their hair is coiffed. Politicians should take advantage of these unsuspecting voters to grow and expand their power in methods that would benefit the United States government. Many critical changes in US policy are not currently popular, such as tax increases or public welfare program adjustments, but these things need to be done. Politicians who can put forward and pass these necessary pieces of legislation while being able to put the egg on someone else's face can stay in power longer to better protect the US from its American citizenry.
It is important for governments to balance realism with ethical principles. While some aspects of Machiavellianism, such as strategic thinking and pragmatism, can be valuable, a government should prioritize ethical behavior, transparency, and the well-being of its citizens to maintain trust and legitimacy. Finding a middle ground between Machiavellian tactics and ethical governance is crucial for a healthy democracy.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was Henry VIII more of an Renaissance man or machiavellian?
machiavellian because he always favoued himself and many people were scared of him
What is High Machiavelli and low Machiavelli?
High Machiavellian individuals are those who are skilled manipulators, strategic thinkers, and have a strong ability to influence others. They are often seen as ambitious and focused on achieving their goals, sometimes at the expense of others. In contrast, low Machiavellian individuals exhibit less manipulative behavior, are more transparent in their actions, and prioritize cooperation and trust in their relationships.
What are examples of machiavellian tactics?
Machiavellian tactics are more like life principles. For example, be bold, avoid yes-men, user your own judgment, and be aware of ambitious people. Machiavellian tactics involve secrecy and strength to achieve power and political advantages.
Why was Machiavelli not a Machiavellian?
Machiavelli is often seen as not embodying the characteristics of a Machiavellian figure because his work "The Prince" was mainly a commentary on political strategy and government rather than a guide for deceit and manipulation. Additionally, Machiavelli's other works, such as his historical writings, show a more nuanced and complex understanding of human nature and ethics.
Should our government be more open?
The US government would be a lot more open if it was far less partisan. If our representative cared more about what the people wanted or needed instead of protecting their (party) territory.
What are the belief of progressivismm?
1. Government should be more accountable to its citizens. 2. Government should curb the powers and influence of wealthy interests. 3. Government should be given expanded powers so that it could become more active in proving the lives of its citizens. 4. Governments should become more efficient and less corrupt so that they could competently handle a expanded role.
What is a Democrats belief?
They believe that they should have more government unlike the GOP they want to help the less fortunate so yea thanks!!
Who are the machiavellian leaders?
Hitler FDR Elizabeth I Lennin Stalin Peter the Great Napoleon many more
What is a Libertarian today is likely to support?
more central government,more personal freedom
Deffrentiate between surplus and deficit?
If the Government expenditures are more than government receipts this situation represents Budget Deficit and if the government expenditures are less than the government revenue or the revenues are more than expenditures, the budget is Surplus.
How did Napol?
he made government more efficient and less wasteful
Should there be more government regulation or less regulation in the clean air, water, or even food contamination and why ?
I believe there should be more regulations on car/factory emissions and there should be more work put into creating clean water and not dumping your whole storage unit into a body of water
