There are several reasons why people do not land on the moon anymore:
There are a few reasons why we haven't been back to the moon since the early 1970s. One reason is that the Apollo missions were primarily driven by political motivations during the space race with the Soviet Union. Additionally, the cost and resources required for manned moon missions have led space agencies to focus on other priorities such as Mars exploration and space station research.
It doesn't. It's just that we notice the effect more on water than we do on land, because water has more "give", and it's pretty hard for land to flow from one place to another.
it is easy the eathhave a capa de osono that protect the eath but the moon dont have it
Yes, a gibbous moon appears more than half illuminated to people on Earth. It is illuminated between half and full, but not fully illuminated like a full moon.
11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.
there wrer more than 3 people on the moon. there were 12 apollo missions, with more than two people in each
Germany lost a lot of land and rights and adjacent countries gained land and some new countries gained independence. Germany lost a lot of people and I dont think anyone gained people.
You can buy it from the Carpenter Shop.
people dont get poisoned. = more $$$$$. people dont get poisoned. = more $$$$$.
You can but, if people dont want to do stuff about the environment they dont have to
There are a few reasons why we haven't been back to the moon since the early 1970s. One reason is that the Apollo missions were primarily driven by political motivations during the space race with the Soviet Union. Additionally, the cost and resources required for manned moon missions have led space agencies to focus on other priorities such as Mars exploration and space station research.
people devloped more land to get rid of the anima becausthe animal was taking over our land so when people started to buying more land animls tried to find more homes for them and there babies to live in.
It depends. Objects on the Moon weigh 1/6 of what they weigh on Earth , but the Moon has a rougher surface and the spacecraft cannot be closely monitored by chase planes or easily by people in a control room. It's also much easier and cheaper to send a spacecraft into orbit and land on Earth than the Moon, and costs less. In addition it depends on what kind spacecraft; it's easier to land a space-plane like design (such as a space shuttle) on Earth. A Lunar lander, such as the Apollo would be more suited to land on the Moon.
land because there are more activities on land and it is more likely to be on land than in water
Earth is the only planet that people have ever walked on. The only other body away from Earth that people ever walked on is the Moon, and that has not happened in over 40 years. The nearest planet (Venus) is always more than 100 times farther away than the Moon is. Venus is hot enough to melt spacecraft and cook people, so even if it were possible, we would not send people to land on it. The next nearest planet (Mars) is always more than 140 times farther away than the Moon is.
No wind/weather to erode them
It doesn't. It's just that we notice the effect more on water than we do on land, because water has more "give", and it's pretty hard for land to flow from one place to another.