The scientist provided evidence for the theory of evolution by natural selection, which was proposed by Charles Darwin. Through observations of different species and their adaptations to their environments, the scientist showed how species can change over time to better suit their surroundings through the process of natural selection.
Mars is the most likely place to find evidence of life because it has liquid water in the past, which is essential for life as we know it. Additionally, Mars has organic molecules, the building blocks of life, and the presence of methane, which could be produced by microbial life. Lastly, Mars has regions that were once habitable, making it a promising candidate for finding evidence of past or present life.
because ti find out if things are not right or have diseas
It's very unlikely.
A scientist may create an hypothesis on the basis of their observations. If their observations are carelessly made or recorded then any hypotheses they offer will be inaccurate reflections of nature. A scientist may alternatively collect observations to test an hypothesis. If these observations are carelessly made or recorded then the conclusions that the scientist makes about the hypothesis could very well be incorrect. At the very least the conclusions they draw would not be based on sound evidence (because the observations are unsound).
Crabs
They use computer models to show how this new evidence supports formation of a supercontinent long before Pangea.
it helps find evidence in a crime situation
Rodinia is a supercontinent that existed between about 1.3 billion and 750 million years ago. Its breakup and dispersal played a significant role in the development of plate tectonics, as the movement of the continents that were once part of Rodinia led to the formation of new ocean basins and the rearrangement of the Earth's landmasses. This breakup and reconfiguration of Rodinia eventually set the stage for the modern-day configuration of continents and ocean basins.
Rodinia was a supercontinent that existed between 1.3 billion and 750 million years ago. It is believed to have formed when earlier supercontinents broke apart and eventually came together to form Rodinia. Rodinia's breakup played a significant role in shaping the continents and oceans as we know them today.
no
Rodinia is a supercontinent that existed between 1300 - 600 million years ago.
Rodinia formed about 1.3 billion years ago during the Neoproterozoic Era. It was a supercontinent that existed before Pangaea.
There is now way to find corroborative evidence until another one the same age if found.
There is no scientific evidence to suggest that a supercontinent called Rondia existed. Earth's geological history is primarily characterized by supercontinents such as Pangaea, Rodinia, and Gondwana, which have been well-documented through geological research and evidence.
they work in there lab and find all the evidence they can get and then put all the clues together to make a theory
yes it did