0
It would be interesting to know what your hypothesis about oversleeping is, however, I am able to make my own hypothesis. I propose that people who oversleep are just as groggy as people who do not get enough sleep. A possible way to test this hypothesis would be to have 3 groups of volunteers, one of which sleeps at night for only 4 hours, one of which sleeps for 8 hours, and one of which sleeps for 12 hours. You administer some kind of test, perhaps of English and math skills, or of motor skills, and compare the performance of the three groups. You could then also switch people into different groups, so that for example the people who got too little sleep now are getting too much sleep, and then see how everybody does on the tests. The more people you test, the more statistically meaningful your results will be (although, of course, it also costs more to do more testing - this could turn into an expensive study).
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did Descartes and Kepler contribute to the new scientific thinking?
They showed how mathematics and measurement could be used in scientific investigation. (~PSPLieKur)
What is the name of a place where people use telescopes and other scientific equipment?
You could be thinking of a laboratory.
Why did many scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
Why were Wegener's ideas not immediately accepted by the scientific community?
Wegener's ideas of continental drift were not immediately accepted by the scientific community because he did not have a satisfactory explanation for the mechanism that could move continents. Additionally, his hypothesis was contrary to the prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, which focused on fixed continents and seafloor spreading. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained wider acceptance.
What is the hypothesis of a film canister rocket?
The hypothesis of a film canister rocket experiment could be that the chemical reaction between baking soda and vinegar will generate enough pressure to launch the film canister into the air.
What is the nature of sciences hypothesis?
A scientific hypothesis could be described as a reasonable guess. If it checks out, it can be promoted to the status of a scientific theory.
Why is the snorg hypothesis not scientific?
There is no experiment or possible evidence that could prove that invisible snorgs do not exist. So the Snorg Hypothesis is not scientific. On the other hand, the "Negative Snorg Hypothesis" (that they do not exist) is scientific. You can disprove it by catching one.
When talking about the scientific method you suggest that water could accelerate the growth of bread mold This is an?
Hypothesis
What is a a possible explanation for a set of observations or answer to a scientific question?
In the scientific world that could be a theory, hypothesis, qualitative observation, prediction, or an inference. You can choose one.
How do you state an alternative hypothesis?
When more than one hypothesis is shown on a scientific paper, the alternative hypotheses can be numbered. They could use a format like, Hypothesis No. 1, Hypothesis No. 2, and so on.
What could be the hypothesis for an experiment which finds that teens who play video games have increased critical thinking skills?
Hypothesis: Video games provide a useful form of mental exercise. Hypothesis: Teens who play video games have increased critical thinking skills.
Why critical thinking and skepticism are important to scientific inquiry?
Critical thinking is important because a person needs to be able to analyze all the data involved without bias. Being able to look past what you want the results to be, and seeing what they truly are is part of critical thinking. Also not drawing connections where mere coincidence could be the cause is part of critical thinking. Skepticism is important because you need to look at any hypothesis with the intent of trying to disprove it. Scientific experiments often are used to test a hypothesis or theory to make sure it cannot be disproved. That is why science is always changing. The scientific process is designed to test the validity of whatever you think to be true.
Describe the steps of the scientific method?
It is O.H.P.E.C., and it stands for Observation-Hypothesis-Prediction-Experiment,and Conclusion.Observation- stands for Observing or looking at something.Hypothesis-stands for thinking of what could happen in your brain.Prediction- stands for Predicting or thinking of what could happen.Experiment- stands for when you test what you where thinking or what you thought will happen.Conclusion- is when you get the answer of what you thought or you could also know if you are right or wrong.
When reading a scientific paper how would you know that a specific hypothesis could go on to become a law?
I would imagine any hypothesis could go on to be a law but depending on the subject, I would guess most do not
How did Descartes and Kepler contribute to the scientific thinking?
They showed how mathematics and measurement could be used in scientific investigation. (~PSPLieKur)
How does a scientific theory compare a scientific hypothesis?
A scientific hypothesis is an educated guess that can be tested through observation and experimentation. A scientific theory, on the other hand, is a well-substantiated explanation of natural phenomena that is supported by a large body of evidence. The main difference is that a theory has withstood rigorous testing and peer review, making it a more comprehensive and reliable explanation than a hypothesis.
How did Descartes and Kepler contribute to the new scientific thinking?
They showed how mathematics and measurement could be used in scientific investigation. (~PSPLieKur)
