Are there any arguments against the discovery of the moon?

Answer 1

Yes, if you are referring to the variious US manned landings. First of all a good deal of material ( stage separations, re-entry) could not be photographed and so various forms of cartoon and model animation were used- one might logically argue- if one part is wrong, maybe all is. secondly- There is remarkably little interest in nostalgia about the Moon shots- compared to, say, oddly the Beatles, Elvis, the other events of the decade. I don"t think they issued a fortieth anniversary stamp ( US postal Service). another interesting angle is that as the moon is over one Light-Second ( 238,000 miles in closest approach) radio communications to and from the space capsule would be subject to at least a one-second delay- it would have sounded funny- Apart from the usual clipped , tactical dialogue ( Roger, Houston, retro-rockets fired!) one does not notice any such delay- were rehearsed training tapes run on a sort of simulcast? There are other arguments against l00% authenticity of the moon shots, but these are grounded in logic.

Answer 2

There are no credible arguments against the discovery of the moon. Its existence is well-documented and observable, with extensive scientific data supporting its presence in the Earth's orbit.