it could be referring to primary colors, meaning the three basic colors that cannot be made by combining any other colors. these colors are blue, red, and yellow.
No particular movement, per se, but Some/One and much of Do Ho Suh's work is installation art, some of which could also be considered interactive art.
After the Council of Trent, nudity was no longer a part of religious artwork; even infants were depicted clothed. Artists no longer mixed Christian and Pagan subjects in the same painting, an altarpieces in churches became less intricate, so their subjects could be seen from a distance.
The American artist George Catlin became fascinated with Indians in the early 1800s and traveled extensively throughout North America so he could document them on canvas. In his paintings and writings Catlin portrayed Indian life in great detail.
The artistic designs used on some currency were considered too easily counterfeited since the counterfeiter could make numerous errors and because of the complex design those errors would be difficult to notice. A simpler design, while easily counterfeited as well, does not conceal the errors as well as the older complex designs.
It is a primary source because it was taken at the time.
yes it is a primary source
hindi kasi si mark henry hahahaha!
No, a primary source is an original document or an actual witness.
A cartoon story can be considered a secondary source if it is based on information or events that occurred prior to its creation. If the cartoon story directly depicts or records an event as it happens, then it could be considered a primary source.
If a picture is copied directly from the original source, it is still considered a primary source. However, if the picture undergoes alteration or manipulation, it may no longer be considered a primary source.
Could be considered one. Depends on how much reconstruction/remodeling has been done on it. If you visit a 13th century castle you would see how it is made, laid out, and may get an understanding of how people lived, so it would be a primary source.
Yes, a pamphlet written in 1952 could be considered a primary source for Prohibition if it contains information or perspectives from that time period. Primary sources are original materials that provide direct evidence of a historical event or topic.
A primary source for Joan of Arc could be anything written or painted about her in her time 1412-1431.
A hard source is a primary source that provides direct evidence or firsthand information about a topic. This could include documents, data, or original research findings that are considered reliable and credible for academic or journalistic purposes.
Most websites would be considered secondary sources but depending on the information the site contains and when it was created it could be a primary source.
It would be considered a primary source, as it is a direct artifact from the time period being studied. It could provide valuable insights into the beliefs, culture, and history of that time.