well, it is expected to be in the next 20 years... it is a known fact by all the world
By locating where faults are active and where past earthquake have occurred.
Earthquake prediction is currently not possible, as such, seismologists will attempt to quantify the risk posed by a particular fault zone rather than state exactly when an earthquake will occur. For more information, please see the related question.
An oral or written account of previous earthquake activity and location in, near or on the meeting of tectonic or lithospheric plates may serve to predict the location of a future earthquake.
yes, if we have the supplies
the Anatolian fault spans the northern boarder of Turkey. But Istanbul is the largest city to possibly be affected.
Three cities that have a moderate risk of earthquake damage are Los Angeles in the United States, Tokyo in Japan, and Istanbul in Turkey. These cities are located in seismically active regions and have experienced significant earthquakes in the past.
The future tense of risk is will risk.
False. The past occurrence of earthquakes does not guarantee that another earthquake won't happen in the future. Just because an area has not had an earthquake in over a hundred years does not mean that the risk of an earthquake occurring in the future is eliminated. Earthquakes can occur at any time and in any location where geological conditions are conducive to seismic activity.
The area along a fault where there has not been any earthquake activity in a long period of time is referred to as a seismic gap. Seismic gaps are areas of high earthquake risk as accumulated strain is released through a potential future earthquake. Monitoring seismic gaps is important for earthquake hazard assessment and preparedness.
Only that it is inevitable that there will be tsunamis in the future. One risk area is the Cascadia subduction zone of the northern Pacific coast of the U.S., which has a strong chanced of producing a major earthquake and tsunami.
Two factors that help geologists determine earthquake risk are the history of seismic activity in the region and the presence of active fault lines. By studying past earthquakes and fault lines, geologists can assess the likelihood and potential impact of future earthquakes in a specific area.
Not necessarily. Just because an earthquake has not occurred in a region for a long time does not guarantee that one will not happen in the future. It is still important to be prepared for earthquakes regardless of how long it has been since the last one.
well, it is expected to be in the next 20 years... it is a known fact by all the world
By locating where faults are active and where past earthquake have occurred.
Where plates meet
yes because there in earthquake perimeter