King Arthur is a fictional character not a real one!
Can't exactly be sure,but the stuff he discovered is very real.
Scientists are doing tests and they have confirmed that King Arthur may have existed even though there is no such thing as Camelot.It is still debated whether or not he was real. It is for certain that most, (If not all) of English literature that describes him is false. But there may have been a real King Arthur. And we know that his supposed sucessor, Constantine the Third, was real. Meaning we know that Constantine was a king of Britain, but whether or not he followed Arthur is unknown.not ever person thinks so ,but he might be.people say he is coming to life and is trying to stop moredred.
King Arthur was never a real British King but a mythical character from stories that originated in the Royal Courts of Europe in the Middle Ages. He has no relevance to the real history of the British Monarchy. In the Myth, the round table was King Arthur's government. The idea was that everybody at it was equal (There was no head of the table).
No. The closest you can get to Camelot and King Arthur being real would be that King Arthur was actually a Roman who grew up in Britain and so later became King of "Camelot" Which probably didn't exist. :)
Uncle B's real name is Byron Contostavlos.
Arthur
Arthur
Uncle Dock's real name in the novel "The Wanderer" is Whitman.
Arthur's full name is Arthur Timothy Read.
king Arthur's not real
no body killed santa he is real
Uncle Kracker was born with the name Matthew Shafer. (birthdate June 6, 1974)
No, but he was based on a real person.
Camelot is the court of King Arthur..... It's mythical . Yes it was. King Arthur was real and camelot was real, but all of the supposed magical adventures of Arthur and the kingdom of camelot weren't.
yes he was
I think King Arthur was real but you never know whats real and what not.