answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

One consequence of the conflict between Pizarro and Atahualpa was the defeat and capture of Atahualpa by the Spanish conquistadors. This event ultimately led to the downfall of the Inca Empire and the Spanish colonization of Peru.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

7mo ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which was a consequence of the conflict between Pizarro and atahualpa?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Archaeology

What happened between Pizarro and Almagro?

Pizarro and Almagro were originally allies in the Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire. However, tensions arose over the division of spoils and territory. This led to a falling out and ultimately to Almagro's rebellion against Pizarro, resulting in Pizarro having Almagro executed.


What was the exploration years of Francisco Pizarro?

Francisco Pizarro conducted his exploration voyages in the early 16th century, specifically between 1524 and 1533. These explorations led to the conquest of the Inca Empire in modern-day Peru.


What is the differences between hernan cortez and francisco Pizarro?

Hernan Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico, while Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in Peru. Their conquests were key in the Spanish colonization of the Americas. Cortes was known for his cunning tactics, while Pizarro was known for his ruthless approach in dealing with the Inca.


What trade rooutes did francisco Pizarro follow?

Francisco Pizarro mainly followed the Spanish trade routes in the Atlantic Ocean and along the coast of South America. He navigated along the west coast of South America, traveling from Panama down to Peru. Pizarro established new trade routes between Spain and the Inca Empire in Peru.


What does it tell you about the building conflict between temas and medoto?

The building conflict between temas and medoto illustrates a divergence in values or interests that is leading to increasing tension or disagreement between the two parties. This conflict may be rooted in differing perspectives, priorities, or objectives that are driving them apart and making resolution more challenging.

Related questions

In the struggle between Pizarro and atahualpa who was victorious?

Pizzaro


What role did Cortes Montezuma Pizarro and atahualpa play in the conflict between the incas and Aztecs?

He played the person that conquered the country


Why was francisco pizzaro so easily able to defeat the inca?

Because they were in a civil war. The struggle between the brothers Atahualpa and Huascar divide the incas and made them weaker. When Atahualpa allied with Pizarro, they defeated Huascar and when Pizarro betrayed Atahualpa, he conquered the last half of the inca's throne.


What did atahualpa do?

Atahualpa was an Inca. He was in a ciliver war between his and his bother.


What south American empire was invaded by Francisco Pizarro in 1532?

Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca civilization in 1531. He ambushed the Incan ruler, Atahualpa, at a "peace talk", taking him prisoner and demanding a ransom. The Incans gave a fortune in gold and silver for the return of their ruler, but Pizarro took the ransom and executed Atahualpa shortly afterward. Later, he marched to Cuzco unstopped in 1533, thus heralding the end of the Incan Empire.


How did Francisco Pizarro get death?

A dispute broke out in the late 1530s between Almagro and Pizarro over who was to rule the area around Cusco. A civil war began. Pizarro's forces won and in 1538, Pizarro had Almagro killed. In 1541, Pizarro was killed by followers of Almagro's son.


What is the difference between result from and in?

A consequence is something that results from an action.An action results in a consequence.


What was the family relationship between Cortes and Pizarro?

Second Cousins


What happened between Pizarro and Almagro?

Pizarro and Almagro were originally allies in the Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire. However, tensions arose over the division of spoils and territory. This led to a falling out and ultimately to Almagro's rebellion against Pizarro, resulting in Pizarro having Almagro executed.


What is the conflict of the people of consequence by ines taccad cammayo?

The conflict in "The People of Consequence" by Ines Taccad Cammayo revolves around social class divisions and the struggle for power and recognition within a small community. It explores the tensions between the elite ruling class and the marginalized individuals who strive to assert their worth and influence in society. Ultimately, the story delves into themes of identity, belonging, and the desire for agency in a complex social hierarchy.


What is the difference between a behaviour and consequence?

A consequence is the end result of the behavior. The behavior is the act. The consequence is the result. For example, the act (behavior) of armed robbery could lead to the consequence of a prison sentence.


When did Francisco Pizarro's journeys take place?

between 1765-69