answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Milgram study was a psychological experiment conducted by Stanley Milgram in the 1960s to investigate obedience to authority figures. Participants were instructed to administer electric shocks to another individual (a confederate) when they answered questions incorrectly, even when they expressed signs of distress. The study highlighted the power of authority in influencing obedience and raised ethical concerns in research.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

5mo ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is milgram study?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Archaeology

What is the sample of milgram's study?

The sample of Milgram's study on obedience to authority consisted of 40 male participants recruited through newspaper advertisements. They ranged in age from 20 to 50 years old and represented a diverse range of occupations and educational backgrounds. The participants were compensated for their time and participation in the study.


What is the method of Milgram's initial study of obedience?

Milgram's initial study of obedience involved participants delivering electric shocks to another person when they answered questions incorrectly. The key aspect was that the person receiving the shocks was actually an actor, and the study was investigating how far participants would go in obeying an authority figure's instructions to administer increasingly severe shocks.


What are the results of the milgram obedience study?

The Milgram obedience study showed that participants were willing to administer potentially lethal electric shocks to another person when instructed by an authority figure. This demonstrated the power of obedience to authority and highlighted the potential for individuals to act against their moral beliefs under certain circumstances. The study raised important ethical concerns about the treatment of human subjects in psychological research.


Did Milgram's study really shock people?

No, Milgram's study did not actually shock people. The study involved participants pretending to administer shocks to another person, who was actually an actor. The key finding was the extent to which people were willing to obey authority figures to the point of administering potentially harmful levels of electric shock.


Is it true that the purpose of Milgram study on obedience was to find out how many people would obey an authority figure when directly order to violate their own ethical standards?

Yes, that was one of the main purposes of the Milgram study on obedience. The study aimed to investigate the extent to which individuals would obey an authority figure, even when it meant acting against their own moral and ethical beliefs. The results showed that a significant portion of participants were willing to obey authority figures to the point of violating their own conscience.

Related questions

When Judith Kleinfeld replicated Milgram's experiment on small world phenomenon what did she conclude?

Judith Kleinfeld concluded that the small world phenomenon is not as strong as originally believed and that interpersonal connections are not as prevalent as suggested by Milgram's study. She found that participants were unlikely to successfully send a message through personal acquaintances in the same way as in Milgram's original study.


What is the sample of milgram's study?

The sample of Milgram's study on obedience to authority consisted of 40 male participants recruited through newspaper advertisements. They ranged in age from 20 to 50 years old and represented a diverse range of occupations and educational backgrounds. The participants were compensated for their time and participation in the study.


What is the method of Milgram's initial study of obedience?

Milgram's initial study of obedience involved participants delivering electric shocks to another person when they answered questions incorrectly. The key aspect was that the person receiving the shocks was actually an actor, and the study was investigating how far participants would go in obeying an authority figure's instructions to administer increasingly severe shocks.


Who conducted an experiment on the effects of punishment on learning that was in reality a classic experiment on obedience?

Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment on obedience, not punishment. The study, known as the Milgram experiment, aimed to understand the extent to which individuals would obey authority figures, even to the point of administering potentially harmful electric shocks to others.


When did Stanley Milgram die?

Arthur Milgram died in 1960.


When was Arthur Milgram born?

Arthur Milgram was born in 1912.


When was Boris Milgram born?

Boris Milgram was born in 1960.


In the original experiment participants thought the study was about what in the obedience study?

Participants in the original obedience study conducted by Stanley Milgram were led to believe that the study was about the effects of punishment on learning and memory. They were told that the study was investigating the role of punishment in improving memory retention.


When was milgram born?

Stanley Milgram was born on 1933-08-15.


What are the results of the milgram obedience study?

The Milgram obedience study showed that participants were willing to administer potentially lethal electric shocks to another person when instructed by an authority figure. This demonstrated the power of obedience to authority and highlighted the potential for individuals to act against their moral beliefs under certain circumstances. The study raised important ethical concerns about the treatment of human subjects in psychological research.


When was Stanley Milgram born?

Stanley Milgram was born on 1933-08-15.


Are there similarities between milgram and rosenhan's experiment?

Both the Milgram and Rosenhan experiments involved deception and ethical concerns. Milgram's obedience study examined the extent to which people would obey authority figures, while Rosenhan's study focused on the ability of mental health professionals to accurately diagnose mental illness. Both experiments raised questions about the ethical treatment of participants and the responsibilities of researchers.