Archaeologist draw conclusions about an ancient civilization by analyzing artifacts discovered on sites
Archaeologists draw conclusions about ancient civilizations by analyzing artifacts, structures, and other remains. They use scientific methods such as carbon dating, DNA analysis, and isotopic analysis to determine the age of the findings. By combining this data with historical records and other evidence, archaeologists can piece together a picture of how the civilization lived, thrived, and interacted with their environment.
An archaeologist or a historian specializing in ancient civilizations would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if the Sumerians used slaves. These experts would analyze the content of the carving, as well as historical and archaeological evidence, to draw conclusions about the social structure and labor practices of the Sumerian society.
In Chapter 15 of "Canyons," Tibbits is qualified to examine the skull because he is an archaeologist and has experience in studying ancient remains. He also has specialized knowledge in identifying and analyzing bones, allowing him to accurately determine the age and origin of the skull. Additionally, his expertise in the field gives him the necessary skills to draw conclusions about the skull's significance within the story.
They compare and contrast the ideas from multiple resources
Historians use a combination of critical analysis, cross-referencing multiple sources, identifying patterns, and considering various perspectives to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions. They also employ historical context, empathy for historical actors, and theoretical frameworks to interpret the evidence in a meaningful way. Collaboration with other historians and subject matter experts can also help to validate findings and conclusions.
Historians use various sources of evidence such as primary documents, secondary sources, artifacts, and personal accounts to synthesize information. They analyze these sources critically to develop historical interpretations and draw conclusions about the past. By comparing and contrasting different sources, historians construct a coherent narrative to present a comprehensive understanding of historical events.
the archaeologlat is the careful uncovering of evidence
By looking and finding things that have been left behind by the early peoplesArchaeologist draw conclusions about an ancient civilization by analyzing artifacts discovered on sites
Without the excerpt provided, it is impossible to draw any conclusions about the author.
Inferences
Draw conclusions based on details from the reading.
They explore a subject from different angles to draw conclusions.
When you think you have found the answer to your question.
An archaeologist or a historian specializing in ancient civilizations would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if the Sumerians used slaves. These experts would analyze the content of the carving, as well as historical and archaeological evidence, to draw conclusions about the social structure and labor practices of the Sumerian society.
Draw conclusions
You consult with a tax expert.
f
As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.