Yes in ways. It is a way to test prodects with out putting people in danger. Also with animal food and medicens they practice on animals to see how well they work. I think it's ridicouluse personaly. In my mind animals should be treated the same way as humans. After all they have nerves systems too don't they?
do the benefits of animal testing outweigh the financial costs? -apex
because animal testing could get you arrested
no not any more
The benefits to animal testing is that some people can be saved if they have a disease for example cancer but the animal goes through pain, usually doesn't survive or isn't the same so its a choice between the animals life or the humans. I strongly disagree with animal testing for a beauty product.
Avon never uses animal testing on any of its products. They are committed to continue this policy of no animal testing.
yes there is, look on google ^^
Yes
Not many companies use animal testing these days, although you'll find plenty of them overseas.
No. Fudge Hair Products do no type of testing on animals.
because scientist are cruel and don't care for any one's feeling
no it is not as bad then animal testing
Defenders of animal testing credit it for major medical breakthroughs, including penicillin, insulin, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for childhood leukemia, hip replacement and heart bypass surgeries. They find the loss of animal life and well being an acceptable price to pay for the benefits to humans.Those against animal testing generally argue that it's cruel, unnecessary, scientifically unsound and expensive, and that the results are misleading. They believe that more accurate testing can be carried out with computer modeling, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, human tissue and cell cultures, autopsies and biopsies.