Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Since we can't see the graph, we can't help you.
it is still a line graph
This phrase suggests that just because something is true, it still requires evidence or proof to validate its authenticity or correctness. It emphasizes the importance of verifying truths through evidence and supporting facts.
yes it is, your still comparing things so it is considered a graph
The exact location where the first humans were born is still a topic of debate among scientists. However, evidence suggests that early homo sapiens likely originated in Africa.
When life originated on Earth is still a hotly debated in science. The evidence available was from already fairly complex bacteria. These bacteria must have evolved from more simple life forms but little or no evidence exists to confirm this.The first conclusive evidence for life comes from the Neoarchean Era(2,800 - 2,500Ma) about 2.74 billion years ago.However there is evidence that there was bacteria alive in the Paleoarchean Era(3,600 - 3,200Ma) about 3.45 billion years ago.
A velocity time graph is still a velocity time graph - no matter the degree of detail that you look at it.
No, but there is fossil evidence to suggest that there was very simple forms of life (bacteria) on Mars many years ago when the planet still had an atmosphere and unfrozen water.
No, it crashed
No
No. If the horizontal axis is time, and the vertical axis is speed, and you're standing still,Then the graph is perfectly horizontal, and it coincides with the horizontal axis.
Some bacteria may not fulfill Koch's postulates due to various reasons such as the inability to culture them in a lab setting, the presence of asymptomatic carriers, or the complexity of their interactions with the host's immune system. These bacteria may still be implicated in causing diseases based on epidemiological evidence and other experimental data.