A vetranarian, zookeeper, and biologists help animals in captivity.
Arguments for: Testing on animals can provide valuable information on the safety and efficacy of new drugs and treatments, ultimately benefiting human health. It can also help scientists understand biological processes and diseases that can't be replicated in other models. Arguments against: Using animals for tests can be viewed as unethical due to the suffering and harm inflicted on them. There are also concerns about the reliability and relevance of animal models to human biology, leading to potential inaccuracies in research outcomes. Additionally, advancements in alternative testing methods are making animal testing less necessary.
ZOO CAPTIVITY: nicer and better for animals :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) (i think)
some people think that animals have rights to but others consider them less important than humans
Unfortunate.
zoos
Its just another way of mass produce and it's terrible how we raise animals solely for consumption
If we accept that animals can suffer and that there should be justice in the world, then it is obvious that no one has no right to inflict suffering or illness or disfigurement on any innocent creature.
There caretakers feed them.
Yes?
yes. it usually happens in captivity(the zoo) and they go mad. it's one of the main reasons why people protest against zoos.
wild mammals should not be held in captivity because if the whales are in the aquariams, they bang their heads against the walls out of boredom and limmit to swimming. an example is the star of free willy had a teeth disease and a problem with his dorsal fin.